Skip to main content

AI is getting better

 These are interesting articles from a few weeks ago, AI is getting better at solving hard problems:


https://fortune.com/2025/02/12/openai-deepresearch-humanity-last-exam/

https://www.techradar.com/computing/artificial-intelligence/could-you-pass-humanitys-last-exam-probably-not-but-neither-can-ai

Comments

Anonymous said…
These news stories are not that accurate.
Anonymous said…
9:06 -- I agree some of this is hype, but they are correct that there have been rapid improvements.
Anonymous said…
LANL plans to be the "AI" lab! The problem is they are way behind ORNL, ANL, LBNL and way way behind industry, like way behind. The other issue is that LANLs publications are falling while these other labs and industry the publications are increasing. If you really want to make an impact on AI you need to have top scientists with freedom and the resources to to publish.
LANL seems to think that AI research is just about having computers and people have nothing to do with it. Most LANL staff are now saying amongst themselves that LANLs AI efforts are poorly planed and have little hope of ever having impact.

LANL will never be the "AI" lab and there is little to no chance it will ever have any impact in this field. In fact I would venture to say that LANLs scientific impact is going to continue to decline.

I would guess if DOE really wants a AI lab they will need to start a new one, or it will be at ANL or ORNL. There was recent APS meeting which was the largest physics meeting of all time and I know for a fact that people from ex-LANL people at ORNL where telling everyone how much better it was and to get out of LANL.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!