Skip to main content

Earthquake domino-effect

Image
By scooby

 This is a very interesting claim : that a devastating earthquake in the Pacific Northwest, could also trigger an earthquake on the San Andreas, perhaps one might suppose even affecting the entire West Coast of the United States.


https://phys.org/news/2025-10-cascadia-megathrust-earthquake-trigger-san.html

Comments

Anonymous said…
At this point it also makes sense to bring up the volcanic hazard -- in some cases volcanos can be influenced by seismic activity:

https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-earthquakes-trigger-volcanic-eruptions

https://survivingcascadia.com/volcanoes/
10/04/2025 5:10 AM
Anonymous said…
Sounds like the same fear that some had before the Trinity Test--the infinite fision glitch. If it could happen, it would have happened already and geologists would know about it. Somehow I think this seismic perpetual motion machine is going to run out of steam before the world turns into a giant self-sustaining oscillator.
10/05/2025 1:43 PM
Anonymous said…
1:43 -- there is actual evidence for large earthquakes triggering volcanoes, see these two cases for example in other parts of the world

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_Valdivia_earthquake
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Kamchatka_earthquake

According to a chatbot, though, the oral traditions of Pacific Northwest tribes do not directly connect tsunami activity (as produced in a large subduction zone earthquake) with volcanism, although they do connect seismic activity with volcanism that is presumably the shaking around the volcano itself.

Of course, some people have speculated that a large earthquake could cause catastrophic landslides or lahars on Mt Rainier, (even without an eruption) with consequences that could be perhaps similar to the Armero disaster in Columbia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armero_tragedy
10/06/2025 2:56 AM
Anonymous said…
Scientists warn California should prepare for destructive 'supershear' earthquakes

https://phys.org/news/2025-09-scientists-california-destructive-supershear-earthquakes.html
10/07/2025 3:30 PM
Anonymous said…
Evidently what could compound the disaster would be the disfunction in FEMA after their policies were reformed by the Drumpf administration:

https://www.texasstandard.org/stories/texas-july-4-flood-fema-response-richardson-investigation/
10/09/2025 6:47 PM
Anonymous said…
You'll own nothing and be happy!
10/10/2025 4:23 PM
Anonymous said…
This is also an interesting article about how flooding can affect California, Oregon, and some of the Southwestern states:

https://www.usgs.gov/centers/pcmsc/news/arkstorm-californias-other-big-one

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Flood_of_1862

https://youtu.be/drLPo1bPvJc?si=pzmbqDUpygu42i7v

This could have an economic impact even higher than an earthquake scenario, and it is known to happen every few hundred years. Many homes and buildings could be flooded, washed away, or even completely under water.
10/13/2025 3:23 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

tcp1 looking good

By scooby
I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...
105 comments
Read more