Skip to main content

Will LLNS be gone by 2030?

 Should the DOE/NNSA end the

LLNS contract to manage LLNL on or before 2030 in favor of a non-profit contractor? Less expensive, better employee morale, more of a science and engineering focus?

Comments

Anonymous said…
LLNS will be gone for sure. A better question is will LLNL be gone or will the United States be gone.
Anonymous said…
Prediction is hard, especially about the future. We don't even know if Trump will be gone from the White House in 2030, or serving a third term.

If LLNS can play it's cards right, bribing the proper officials, why can't they retain the management contract virtually forever? It's not a merit based system, after all. I can see LLNS securing "One Big Beautiful Contract" that extends their operations well past 2030.
Anonymous said…
https://ai-2027.com

According to this by 2030 there may not even be humans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_onqn68GHY

The Dow Jones gets to a million by 2029 and AI kills everyone in 2030.

Anonymous said…
If the DJIA gets to a million in 2029, only for all of humanity to be exterminated the following year, it will still have been worth it. At least I will have been rich on paper for year, so count me in!
Anonymous said…
Why would NNSA admit that they made a mistake going to a for-profit model? To save money? It's not their money and unless a DOGE guideline came down from above, there is no incentive to go back to the non-profit model. Indeed the state probably prefers this model with the taxable income of the for-profit model. Why would anyone think the employee morale would improve - will a better retirement and medical coverage come into play - which would counter the save money issue. Does NNSA care about science or just paper shuffling and the opportunity to get their picture taken when something good happens at a national lab? The genie has been let out of the bottle and the bottle was sold as scrap metal.
Anonymous said…
11:04 Actually, it could be a period of intense suffering over the next few years, if these truly are the end times. The chatbot gave the following rationale for that. Essentially if this Christian belief is true, (which many Americans believe) the Lord in his great mercy will provide intense suffering so that people can "repent" and thereby avoid even more suffering after the final judgement.

Within Christian eschatology (the study of end times), many interpretations of biblical texts, particularly in books like Matthew and Revelation, describe a future period of intense global suffering. This era, often called the "Great Tribulation," is depicted as a time of unprecedented war, natural disasters, and societal collapse. From this theological viewpoint, the purpose of this intense hardship is not simply punitive but also redemptive. It is seen as a final, urgent call to humanity, designed to break through spiritual indifference and demonstrate the consequences of a world separated from God. The belief is that this period of profound crisis will serve as a catalyst, compelling many people to "repent"—to fundamentally reconsider their lives, turn away from sin, and seek reconciliation with God before a final judgment.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Peter%203%3A7%20-%203%3A9&version=NIV
Anonymous said…
BS! Stop spamming us with your escathologie!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...