Skip to main content

CA Cost of Living

Image
By scooby



Are Livermore Lab employee raises and retiree colas, keeping up with the CA cost of living? If not, is this impacting recruitment and retention?

https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/639ba3621a72923685807b82/6914c26e40d0c8ed334f2bb5_TF_Report_CostOfLiving2025.pdf

Comments

Anonymous said…
“Improvements Needed for Overseeing Contractor Workforce Recruitment and Retention Efforts”

“GAO is making two recommendations for NNSA to (1) track the time it takes to review contractors' human resources requests and (2) fully assess and identify the information it needs to oversee M&O contractors' recruitment and retention efforts.”

So, the NNSA Contractors are trying, but perhaps the NNSA could be more responsive?

https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-106861
11/16/2025 1:22 PM
Anonymous said…
Yes, the cost of living has been impacting retention. Many of the employees that want to start a family or are trying to raise a family really have no choice with the cost of housing. The long commutes that come with that burden are taking a toll as well.
11/16/2025 6:02 PM
Anonymous said…
Many San Joaquin and Stan counties LLNL employees are beginning to question their choices. This is despite the option of remote work.
The new west tracy "city" has added a surprisingly high load on traffic! not to mention a high mortgage
11/16/2025 7:06 PM
Anonymous said…
“This is despite the option of remote work” traditionally Stanislaus and San Joaquin counties were home to the hourly Crafts, janitorial, machinists, technicians, PSO and other support staff that NEVER had the option for remote work. Now they have to compete with the higher paid remote workers for housing. This is causing financial distress and a retention issue with that group of employees.
11/17/2025 5:28 PM
Anonymous said…
What is the approximate remaining % of LLNS employees at LLNL on TCP1
referenced to the 2007 transition population?
11/24/2025 8:36 AM
Anonymous said…
8:36 last years plan notification put it around 1,000 TCP1 employees still working and paying into the broken system.
11/24/2025 5:02 PM
Anonymous said…
5:02 Why do you believe TCP1 is a “broken system”? Are you comparing TCP1 to the UC pension, other NNSA lab retirement systems, CalPERS?
11/25/2025 6:52 AM
Anonymous said…
3 in 10 Bay Area residents can't cover basic needs, report says

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e-UPECqGBAg&pp=ygUUMyBvdXQgb2YgMTAgYmF5IGFyZWE%3D
11/26/2025 8:55 AM
Anonymous said…
California loses one taxpayer per minute, Florida gains

https://www.weny.com/news/national/california-loses-one-taxpayer-per-minute-florida-gains/article_9fdeac07-f7c5-5424-b95d-ea323c805dfa.html
11/26/2025 4:15 PM
Anonymous said…
6:52 Compare TCP1 October 2007 financials to current TCP1 Financials. This doesn’t look good for the folks who will draw their first check in 2047.
11/28/2025 8:33 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

tcp1 looking good

By scooby
I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...
105 comments
Read more