Skip to main content

LANL may need to double plutonium pit production



LANL may be asked to double plutonium pit production, per federal memo.

Up to 60 pits per year.

The comment section in the news article devolves in the usual fight between the two anti-nuke groups "The Los Alamos Study Group" vs The nuclear watch group. These groups are like two age old enemies forever locked in the battle to the death. You almost get the feeling that Los Alamos is really just playing a minor role in what really motivates these guys which is their hatred for each other.

If there is ever WW3 and the earth every last nuke is used and the only two people left alive are Greg Mello and Jay Coughlan, they would still be fighting. It will be like "Let this be your last battlefield from the old Start Trek show" in which each is half black and half white (though on opposite sides from each other), and committed to destroying the other.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Another article from the other day

https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/plan-on-lanls-path-for-next-15-years-expected-any-day-now/article_55761919-c85b-458c-94a6-6e205f5450ae.html

Plan on LANL's path for next 15 years expected 'any day now'

And yes the the online comment section is once again the two heads of the anti-LANL groups Greg Mello and Coughlin going nuclear on each other.

Anonymous said…
Mason has been making some interesting gyrations this week about the need for the lab to do a 180 deg and change from a fervent no-work zone into a hard work zone that never makes any mistakes or has any accidents. Somehow Project Velocity is supposed to deliver this transformation without cutting the ranks of our massive bureaucracy. It seems like NNSA is saying unpleasant things to TRIAD like "figure out how to deliver output for the billions we send you our we'll find somebody else who can." But is any of this real or just more empty bluster from Washington? In all likelihood, TRIAD is thinking that they can outlast the administration, just make the motions for three years, then go back to the good old days of counting the money while the lab excells at exceeding all of their targets in the production of paperwork.
Anonymous said…
…so, from one to two. The best and the brightest!
Anonymous said…
How does LANL become this super efficient entity and also a "force for good" which consists of mass dissipation of money on useless things. These are in contradiction.
Anonymous said…
Mason also wants to move from stockpile maintenance and essentially remodeling the existing stockpile with the latest technology to replacing the stockpile with completely new designs.

Speaking of remodeling and increasing output at the production plant… where does he think all these new production plant workers plan on living?
Anonymous said…
"Speaking of remodeling and increasing output at the production plant… where does he think all these new production plant workers plan on living?"

Santa Fe, Abq and Espanola.

Of course one thing could be to try and get rid of the older science workforce but they may not move out of the town. You can at least take there old offices.

It is almost like nobody thought this through.
Anonymous said…
They can all commute from Los Lunas, or maybe Rio Rancho for the rich ones. It's only a three or four hour round trip drive every day. There are 8 hours in a work day, so that still leaves 4 or 5 hours to get work done. And let's be honest, most of these new hires don't have any real value to add anyway, so if they get nothing done, it likely helps the lab.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.