Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Sunday, May 5, 2013

Accused Chinese spy charged with downloading porn, not NASA secrets

Accused Chinese spy charged with downloading porn, not NASA secrets Source: http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/3/4296096/bo-jiang-accused-chinese-spy-arrested-for-porn-not-espionage Bo Jiang, the Chinese national accused of spying on NASA, was formally charged in a Virginia court this week — not for conducting espionage, but for downloading porn and pirated movies to his computer. A former research contractor at NASA's Langely Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, Jiang was originally indicted on March 20th, when federal investigators arrested him just before he departed on a one-way ticket from Washington, DC to Beijing. At the time, authorities accused Jiang of sharing sensitive information with the Chinese government — he had a NASA-issued laptop with him at the time of his in-flight arrest — but as Bloomberg Businessweek reports, it now appears that their fears were unfounded. On Thursday, Jiang plead guilty to misdemeanor charges for violating NASA's computer security rules. Authorities say they uncovered sexually explicit materials and illegally downloaded movies on the computer seized at Dulles International Airport, but found no sensitive or proprietary information. Jiang had initially been charged of providing false statements about the contents of his computer, but US Assistant Attorney General Gordon Kromberg said those accusations have since been resolved. "DR. JIANG IS RELIEVED THIS ORDEAL IS OVER." "None of the computer media that Jiang attempted to bring to the PRC [People's Republic of China] on March 16, 2013, contained classified information, export controlled information, or NASA proprietary information," reads a statement of facts filed the case, which was heard in a federal court in Newport News, Virginia. "Dr. Jiang is relieved this ordeal is over," Fernando Groene, Jiang's lawyer, said in an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek. "Although he was accused in arena of public opinion and in the halls of Congress, once due process was given he was cleared of any and all allegations that he was a spy." Jiang's initial arrest was spearheaded by Representative Frank Wolf (R-VA), who earlier this year said that NASA whistleblowers were concerned about potential leaks from foreign nationals. In a subsequent hearing at the House Appropriations subcommittee, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden identified Jiang as one of 281 foreign born employees accused of posing security threats. The 31-year-old researcher lost his job at NASA in December, after returning from a month-long trip to China. "I REMAIN CONCERNED." In a statement released this week, Wolf said he still has concerns over why Jiang was allowed to leave the country with a NASA-issued computer. "I remain concerned that neither the prosecutors nor NASA have addressed the original question of why a NASA laptop was inappropriately provided to a restricted foreign national associated with ‘an entity of concern’ and why he was allowed to take the laptop and all of its information back to China last December," the congressman said in an e-mail to Bloomberg Businessweek.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Back in the late 1990s, it was Rep. Christopher Cox (R-CA) who generated the Chinese witch hunt hysteria over supposedly lost national security secrets. It resulted in the Wen Ho Lee fiasco.

This time, it's Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA)

Anonymous said...

The only "fiasco" in the WHL case was the government's failure to appreciate until it was too late to change course, that to obtain conviction, it would have to divulge SRD information in open court, despite being repeatedly told this by almost everyone involved in the computer forensics.

Anonymous said...

Next time you see and complain about articles of US citizens apprehended and mistreated in China, think reciprocity and about incidents like these. White US citizens would get a slap on the wrist for the same violation. Here a conclusion was pre-determined and when they had no evidence they threw the worst the could for rule violations. Racism involved in the decision? You bet! No lessons learned from Wen Ho Lee.

Anonymous said...

It is not racism. The (white British) security head of Huawei will get the same treatment as this Chinese chap for any rule violation. The Huawei person, for all intents and purposes, is part of the Chinese system of corruption and control. That is what will cause someone to be a target. Not their ethnicity.

Anonymous said...

Where is Wen Ho Lee today? Is he on the motivational speech circuit? Is he still in New Mexico? Teaching? Walmart greeter? Just wondering...

Anonymous said...

Considering the state of NASA for the past four years, it might be a credible defense to ask how the authorities determined that the information was porno and not secret.

Anonymous said...

Where is a good racist like the DOE's infamous Notra Trulock when you need him?

Anonymous said...

This Chinese fellow is the target of a witch hunt. Expect to see more "reciprocity" of American citizens in China. (Sadly, i think the Chinese government will target US Citizens of asian ancestry as well).

Anonymous said...

Some of the above commentary reveals yet another aspect of LLNL culture you should be aware of, the ingrained anti-academia sentiment. Much of the blame rests on the shoulders of the UC Faculty Senate whose historic disdain for UC management of LANL and LLNL was no secret, not to mention the widespread and comparatively valid perception within the research community that the Labs were awash with easy research money obtained without the niceties of peer review.

Anonymous said...

Trying to shop your comment around and see if it sticks anywhere? Pathetic.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days