Skip to main content

Moniz alternates

Image
By scooby
It seems like its taking a very long time to find a new head of NNSA. I wonder if the delay in confirming Moniz as DOE Secretary has held up the NNSA job or are they just having trouble finding someone to volunteer for this kamikaze mission.

Here are some people I'd be okay with at the top of NNSA:

Aston Carter (DOD Deputy Secretary)
Steven Koonin (former DOE Undersecretary for Science, current Jason and LLNS Board member)
Andrew Weber (DOD Asst Sec for Nuclear, Chemical, Biological Programs)
Michele Flournoy (former DOD Undersecretary for Policy)
Bruce Goodwin

Comments

Anonymous said…
Either someone is posting this to see what the bait will catch, or they are clueless in the ways of Washington. Most of the names on the list already had a higher level position and are not going to be interested in a lower level job. The idea makes about as much sense as asking George to be a new AD.
5/13/2013 3:26 AM
Anonymous said…
Donald Cook would be the natural choice. NA-10 has been the springboard to NA-1 in the past. He has the education, lab experience, and political pedigree for the job. He has already committed to staying in NNSA for another term so the Administrator/Under Secretary position would be a step up. I would expect SNL to see more benefits with a Cook selection though. He is a Z-machine guy, and has no love for NIF. He also spent time as the head of AWE, and is keen on the idea of consolidating Physics/Engineering DA missions.
5/13/2013 7:15 AM
Anonymous said…
Madelyn Creedon, Patricia Falcone, Anne Herrington, and Rebecca Hersman each should be considered above Cook.
5/13/2013 8:35 AM
Anonymous said…
NA-10 has been the springboard to NA-1 in the past.

May 13, 2013 at 7:15 AM


While this may have been the path for D'Agostino, Brooks came out of NA-20 and Gordon moved over from CIA. Hard to see much of any trend in that history.
5/13/2013 10:59 AM
Anonymous said…
Madelyn Creedon, Patricia Falcone, Anne Herrington, and Rebecca Hersman each should be considered above Cook.

May 13, 2013 at 8:35 AM


Quite the feminist poster here, aren't we? Of the 4 ladies listed above, Dr. Falcone is the only one that has the proper technical background. The other 3 are policy wonks.
5/13/2013 11:39 AM
Anonymous said…
"Of the 4 ladies listed above, Dr. Falcone is the only one that has the proper technical background."

May 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM

Intellectual snob, perhaps? Do not know what would be considered the 'proper' technical background, but since NNSA was created, do know that no insider from the lab clan has made it all the way to NA-1. Falcone is an insider through and through, and has slim chance to be given serious consideration for the slot.
5/13/2013 4:46 PM
Anonymous said…
Anyone smart enough to be the Administrator would not be dumb enough to take the job.
5/13/2013 6:07 PM
Anonymous said…
5/13 8:35 AM and 5/13 4:46 PM are likely the same poster, and most likely an NNSA staffer. Comments like those is why the NNSA is viewed as incompetent by both the Lab and DoD communities.
5/13/2013 7:41 PM
Anonymous said…
OK, Mr. blog forensics expert. No chance you are "likely" wrong? Didn't think so. All comments you don't agree with are "incompetent"? My forensics indicate you are a disgruntled labbie with a PhD and no job on the horizon, and no means by which to convince your bosses you are worth a job.
5/13/2013 9:12 PM
Anonymous said…
One name you will not see on such lists is Neile Miller. When she overturned the career civil service employee decisions not to award contract year extensions to M&O contractors (including LLNS) that had failed to earn them, politics was introduced into the process. When she inserted herself into the Y-12 contract re-bid at the absolute last moment, and overruled the source selection process, her future in DC was limited. In the strange way that politics works, it is less the fact that both of these were lousy decisions and more that she permitted both of them to get out in the public in a smelly state.
5/14/2013 10:49 AM
Anonymous said…
Neile has obviously done as much as she can to ensure a lucrative position after she is shown the door.
5/14/2013 7:48 PM
Anonymous said…
It is really a conundrum to fill the Job of NNSA Administrator. First of all the pay is not too substantial at ~$180k. That salary is within the reach of lab staff, and typical of lab first tier managers/group leaders. Sure, one can live modestly in DC on that salary, but most people who have the credentials and competencies for the job (lab and industry executives) are making 3-5 times that salary, with the exception of Flag Officers/Federal SES (and only a small handful of Federal SES members would be strong candidates). Which narrows the field of candidates down to someone that is independently wealthy or so eager for power that they would commit financial suicide.
Money aside it is really a thankless position, as congress has so little trust for the NNSA that most it’s budget line items are constrained, so the NNSA really has a very narrow management space to operate in, and can really only “fine tune” budgets and programs. The policy and requirements flow out of the DoD and the Whitehouse, not the NNSA. In such an over constrained environment even an excellent technical leader would have his hands tied. NNSA is really just a mechanism to divert money to the labs and plants and the administrator ends up being a lightning rod for when something goes wrong.
5/15/2013 6:42 AM
Anonymous said…

Good analysis.
5/15/2013 9:54 PM
Anonymous said…
Don Cook named acting NNSA administrator: http://blogs.knoxnews.com/munger/2013/05/neile-miller-announces-her-dep.html#more
5/18/2013 7:00 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more