Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it. Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
Comments
You mean: how much could they raise the pension contribution to
I asked that question at one of those transition meetings and they hemmed and hawed and basically said there was no cap.
Parney said it wouldn't go above 7%...but then Parney also said there would be a 80m LLNS contribution to the pension (never happened), your VSP choice would not be shared until after Thur (list already circulating), so...take it with a grain of salt.
The pension math is brutal once you no longer have a steady influx of new members at a (growing) base of the pyramid.
We have a ton of people in the 50-60 age range where they don't need to get any raises in order to get significant yearly pension increases. They need to incentivize those people out so they can arrest the yearly increase to COLA only.
AnonymousMay 24, 2013 at 3:00 PM
Livermorons would eat their own babies just to keep NIF alive.
May 24, 2013 at 3:40 PM
Perhaps this writer wanted to say that the lab "already ate" meaning "did eat"...
...how have we turned "LLNL-The True Story" to an English grammar online class?
http://www.englishpage.com/modals/would.html
May 24, 2013 at 11:17 PM
Which was the intent!!!
What a bunch of dullards. No wonder nothing useful has come out of Livermore for decades.
Did you look up the modal forms of "would" yet? And how is the original sentence in the "wrong tense" when it is using the proper modal form? Or are you changing your excuses (admission that you were wrong on claiming "wrong tense")?
Here is another example of the same correct usage of the modal form for "would."
A moron on the blog would correct other posters' grammar despite his own ignorance regarding simple rules of grammar.
You are wrong quite often. What's going on? Is everything okay overthere?
It uses a correct modal form for "would."
A bunch of bitter losers gleefully chortling at anything they can imagine goes wrong, which inevitably descends into insulting one another over something pointless and stupid.
Wrong tense, "have eaten"
Again, May 24, 2013 at 3:40 PM is wrong. I don't think he has gotten the lesson though. So I'll keep reminding him until he does.
All Moron conference participants sat around a great, large table in B-111 or was that in B-235, maybe it was in B-453...They put a motorcycle on the table and asked: "what is this"? No one knew what it was. After much thought, a normal looking moron said: "it is a motorcycle." All the morons got up, applauded and yelled "yeaha! Monron the the year."
In 2012, at the second annual morons' conference. Same place, same participants. They put a bicycle on the table and asked: what is this?" Two days went by without answer; suddenly a really good looking moron got up. He looked like he could be second line manager or division leader or maybe A.D.. He calmly said: "it is a bicycle."
The crowd was so excited, they screamed: "yahee!!! Moron of the year" and awarded him a bonus check.
This year, 2013. the same morons conference was organized. It was in mid-May. Same morons came. They put on the table something looked like half of a bike, it only had one wheel but a moron can ride it around.
I forgot what is the name of this one-wheeled thing, what it is called before I can continue my story...
Please help ...
May 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM
You are correct. I believe the original "nazi" was just trying to imply that NIF is already dead, which would be the implication of the form "Livermorons would have eaten their own babies just to keep NIF alive." It wasn't a grammar correction, it was a suggestion that that boat has sailed.
"Livermorons would eat their own babies just to keep NIF alive," and then May 24, 2013 at 3:40 PM said: "Wrong tense, "have eaten"" meaning that May 24, 2013 at 3:00 PM *should* have said: "Livermorons have eaten their own babies just to keep NIF alive."
Now, regardless of the grammar, if you do not believe this to be true, just ask anyone here who does not work on NIF, and has had their project gutted to keep NIF afloat.
Anonymous said...
Wrong tense, "have eaten"
It seems to me all of bloggers in this blog are "mature" adults, yet it seems again, like kids who call others 'morons" while they are the biggest morons in the world.
Especially the person who guessed the "Chinese" something....If it was in fact, a Chinese something; good for that Chinese somebody who try to learn another language, while the "criticizer" might not speak proper English even he is an American-born.
Please have more self-respect.
Don't you feel foolish? Again? Mo
Is there a cure for this moron-ing ina the near future ?
Does ANYONE have any REAL info. regarding a furlough or not? If so, please share. If not, do us all a favor and STFU!
Wrong tense, "have eaten"
Again, May 24, 2013 at 3:40 PM is wrong.
The grammar nazi is also the anti-Obama anti-women anti-union ranter.
May 25, 2013 at 8:33 PM"
In response, not true.
So little Jimmy got caught with his hand in the cookie jar.
His Mother asked him if he took that cookie and Jimmy said no.
Mother said, "Little Jimmy stop telling Obamas'"
Then Jimmy said, "I don't know anything about it".
His Mother said "Jimmy stop telling Eric Holders'"
Finally his Mother said, "Jimmy if you keep lying like this you are going to either grow up and be a Union boss or host a non partisan show on MSNBC".
May 26, 2013 at 11:41 AM
Yes, but May 25, 2013 at 1:49 PM is likely correct, making this entire thread "mute."
That is not correct. How can something be "likely" correct in this case? He didn't make any commentary to change the meaning of the original post. he used the word "wrong" For that, he is clearly wrong.
Lets go into a topic that is more intellectually stimulating than grammar and spelling. Topics like EoS and materials strength experiments on the NIF platform. Or better yet, status of the "fixes" for ignition
May 27, 2013 at 4:18 PM
That is never going to happen on this blog because no one cares if NIF ever gets ignition. I'm sure you have figure that out by now.
May 27, 2013 at 4:56 PM
Yep, it's amazing that any thread that concerns actual science or nuclear weapons gets no comments from a blog associated with a science and nuclear weapons lab!
You sir, are absolutely correct. It started with the transition of LAL to LANL and then punks then gave LLNL to LLNS. This is going to go down in history as one of the biggest blunder the U.S. had even done not only for science but the country. China will be taking the lead very soon if they haven't already and the young being non patriotic where money talks and BS walks is going to follow the money regardless if they have to sell the entire country to foreign nationals. If you'd just stop and watch you'll see this happening right now under your nose. Why? Because they know the national labs have no secure future, no benefits and they have no alternative but to work for those who will offer a defined pension program or their wages are so high they can get that $1.5M to $2.0 M in their savings before age 60. Again, destroying the pension plan UC offered in 1980's to 2004 was the biggest mistake this nation has ever made and this blog proved it over and over again.
You sir, are absolutely correct. It started with the transition of LAL to LANL and then punks then gave LLNL to LLNS. This is going to go down in history as one of the biggest blunder the U.S. had even done not only for science but the country. China will be taking the lead very soon if they haven't already and the young being non patriotic where money talks and BS walks is going to follow the money regardless if they have to sell the entire country to foreign nationals. If you'd just stop and watch you'll see this happening right now under your nose. Why? Because they know the national labs have no secure future, no benefits and they have no alternative but to work for those who will offer a defined pension program or their wages are so high they can get that $1.5M to $2.0 M in their savings before age 60. Again, destroying the pension plan UC offered in 1980's to 2004 was the biggest mistake this nation has ever made and this blog proved it over and over again.
You sir, are absolutely correct. It started with the transition of LAL to LANL and then punks then gave LLNL to LLNS. This is going to go down in history as one of the biggest blunder the U.S. had even done not only for science but the country. China will be taking the lead very soon if they haven't already and the young being non patriotic where money talks and BS walks is going to follow the money regardless if they have to sell the entire country to foreign nationals. If you'd just stop and watch you'll see this happening right now under your nose. Why? Because they know the national labs have no secure future, no benefits and they have no alternative but to work for those who will offer a defined pension program or their wages are so high they can get that $1.5M to $2.0 M in their savings before age 60. Again, destroying the pension plan UC offered in 1980's to 2004 was the biggest mistake this nation has ever made and this blog proved it over and over again.
Sir, you are wrong. The post counts for EoS and ignition related topics are off the charts. Same with the levels of traffic and readership. NIF EoS and ignition threads are the big items. Just see past threads from August. People care a great deal.
And to remind you yet again, more NIF EoS news is coming down the pipeline.
Coming soon enough. Just run some spreadsheet taking in consideration a 10% cut in pay forever and up you 401k contribution by 2%, adjust your living style and do with less. It's only the beginning folks. Remember, one of the questions during the transition was how much could they raise the 401k contribution too. I think the answer was 16%. Your almost 1/2 way there. Give it five more years at ~2% increase per year with no pay raises and all will be well. Mission accomplished.