Skip to main content

Change we can believe in!

Contributed anonymously (by a person with a sense of humor):

We need some CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN. Can we find a 47 year old technically strong leader who can restructure our lab to support the scientific and technical staff in redefining our mission?
Your opinion?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Huh? What's with the 47 year old. I don't care who is age is, as long as he/she has the guts and managerial skills to turn this Lab around.
Anonymous said…
No you will not. The wages aren't there nor is the pension plan. A 401K is not going to get DOE / LLNS what they want. They had a good system with good people. All they're going to get now are transients. If LLNL had decade long term projects with a pension plan equal to UC's they might once again be worth keeping. As it is now it's just another jumping stone for the new breed of employees to put on their resume to get a better paying job and benefits elsewhere.
Anonymous said…
"All they're going to get now are transients." (11:17 AM)

Well, transients is all they want from here on out, fella. You are going to see people come into LLNL to work for about 5 years and then move on to better jobs. It will be much like what happens in most of the corporate world.

Loyalty at LLNL is dead, but LLNS killed it off with a purpose in mind. It's cheaper for LLNS to keep morale low and to continually roll over the exiting workforce with new hires so they can acquire cheap labor and control the remaining workforce with the big stick called fear.

Of course, this will kill off the good science and many of the WFO programs, but what's that got to do with making a buck on the management of LLNL? It's all about money from here on out. Not your money, but theirs'.
Anonymous said…
"All they're going to get now are transients." (11:17 AM)

You're absolutely correct. Many of us young people are here for the sole purpose of putting this relationship on our resume and then we're moving on.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!