Skip to main content

Kaiser co payment now double or triple!

Anonymous said...



Just went to renew my meds, and contrary to what I was told, the copayments are double or triple. I am a retiree- took the buyout, and glad I did! Before, meds were a 90 day supply for one copayment. We were told that the 2009 copayment would only cover 30 days of meds, unless we used Kaiser's mail program, in which case it would cover 90 days, like before. But Kaiser now charges 2 copayments, even if you use the mail. Now $10 for generics, and $25 for non.

NOTE: You gotta fight Kaiser for everything?

At this rate many generics cost less if you forget about your coverage, and just pay the cost of the meds, at Kaisers' member rate. Also ask for a whole bottle. Atenolol costs $10 for 50 pills, (100 days), or $10.50 for 100. Others are similar.


Q. Have others had this problem? How can they possibly say this is "substantially equivalent?" What can we do?

Thanks.

May 2, 2009 10:56 AM

Comments

Anonymous said…
"substantially equivalent?" ... Haven't you heard, that was for
Oct. 1, 2007 only. After Oct. 1, Subs. Equiv. is NOT required ... "required" not written anywhere in the contract. Just like: everyone will have a job on Oct. 1, 2007. You know what happened after Oct. 1 ...Layoff!!
Anonymous said…
NNSA and the for-profit LLCs have a different definition for the term "substantially equivalent" than what you might find in a dictionary.

Enjoy your retirement while you can. I'm sure more "substantially equivalent" changes from NNSA and LLNS are in store for the future.
Anonymous said…
Yes, I noticed that. One Kasier phrmacy employee told me that If I want to pay 1 co-pay to ask my doctor for a 30-day supply; any increment (no matter how small, even if it 2 piils) will cost you a second copay!
Anonymous said…
Check your statistics, the "substantially equivalent" retiree is a dead retiree. Their co-pays have not changed at all.
Anonymous said…
Check out Wal Mart's $4 prescriptions. I get my Atenolol for $4 every month. They 100+ medications on this plan.
Anonymous said…
WalMart might be a lot less.
They also offer 90 days for $10, which can be about one third of the Kaiser "benefit."

Here's the link to Wal Mart, that shows what meds are covered. Note: They also sell many over the counter meds at the same price:

http://i.walmartimages.com/i/if/hmp/fusion/customer_list.pdf

Q. If I have my Kaiser meds, can I just take the bottle to WalMart, or do I need to get a written prescription?
Does that mean I have to get another Dr.s appt?
Anonymous said…
Re: Wal Mart $4 prescriptions....

All you need is a written prescription from your Dr. 1x. I would say a Dr. visit co-pay is worth it!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...