Anonymosuly contributed:
This from R and D magazine dated Dec 22 2009:
"With a staff of about 6,500, LLNL anticipates hiring 5% of that number in 2010."
The naysayers who frequent this blog will be slitting their wrists and drinking coo-laid over this.
This from R and D magazine dated Dec 22 2009:
"With a staff of about 6,500, LLNL anticipates hiring 5% of that number in 2010."
The naysayers who frequent this blog will be slitting their wrists and drinking coo-laid over this.
Comments
There are a lot of lies that get told on this BLOG.
At LLNL, strong growth was seen in the photon and optical science programs, cyber security, and climate programs. With a staff of about 6,500, LLNL anticipates hiring 5% of that number in 2010. Finding experienced mid-career people, however, is a continuing challenge, says Krishnan.
And there you have it 5% in and 5 % out so that's how many people to be laid off in 2010 = 325. I'd say that's about how many are going to retire between June and December of this year. What they are going to do with these inexpereinced people I have no clue. I hope they don't think they're coming to paradise. We do know they'll be "at will" used and abused and then shown the gate when their services are no longer needed. It the new way of the new world and global economy. It's not all good and will not be , ever.
The new hires cost a lot less and don't have the costly benefits associated with the longer term staff. It's called "work force restructuring" and you are going to see a lot of it in the future. None of this applies to the upper management chain, however.
Wow, are you naive! Gulping down the LLNS kool-aide, are you?
Like the rest of the naysayers that frequent this blog you are comments are pure fiction without any basis in fact. Compounding the problem is you, like your fellow doom and gloom, dog pack minded, conspiratists, believe the fiction you promulgate. Tell us something we haven't heard for a change.
And where do you get your information? I think you make it up as you go along. I, like all objective readers of this blog, will judge the relevance of your comments accordingly.
What "science magazines". Can you name one (other than the one posted)?
To the original poster, it's bad form to rant like that. Show a little maturity.
Typical naysayer. I read your rants here day in and day out. I find it amusing that you describe my post as a "rant" while you and your fellow naysayers epitomize the meaning of the word (yell and scream in an impassioned way"). Do I need to post each and every example for you? All I did was post an article excerpt from a respected technical publication and posit the response which would follow.I nailed it didn't I? Thanks for making my point.
You can now go back to your locker and get your knee pads. We'll hold the fort down for you and keep the people informed of reality.
Are you EBA? I,personally, no of nobody who is EBA. I have more work than I have ever had and I am totally over-subscribed.Is your resume in order?
"I know of at least 2 in RHWM who were told that they would be put on EBA status in February."
So you still don't know anybody who is actually EBA. Can anybody on this blog tell us where all of the supposed EBA folks are hiding? I mean, isn't the end near? Isn't there supposed to be a gigantic layoff and isn't the Lab going to be shut down. According to some, we should have lost several thousand employees by now. Less guess work and conjecture, more FACTS.
We used to have more than 10,000 people working here.
Now I see the number is 6500,
and I think that includes all the Bectel managers.
What was the work force when LLNS took over, and we were promised that "Nothing will change on October 1"
(Of course, they never said anything about right after that!)
I also know of 2 people who were given 30-90 days of EBA and then were told they would be shown the door if they could not find a new project.
EBAs are nothing new and it adds flexibility for the staff. As WFO can be cyclic and sometimes beyond our control, it is a needed mechanism to hold on to staff. Why is this a big deal?
Must be some sort of manager hired by LLNS to put a positive spin on what LLNL is today. Got news for you. It isn't going to happen simply because LLNL is slowly but surely turning into nothing worth DOE and NNSA to run and NIF is just a long shot far from ever being part of todays national independence and energy crisis solution. Once again we've put all the eggs in the wrong basket. The American's tax payers dollars could have been used to build solar arrays across the entire face of the desert lands, geothermal plants, wind power plants and sea wave power plants. Heck we could've built nuclear power plants off shore like those used on our Naval aircraft carries and be far ahead of the game. But what did we do? Well, the big oil companies dropped the fuel prices at the pump to less then $3.00 and now everyone is pacified and some haven't taken note it's on the climb again. What a problem orientate focused nation we are, hah? It's amazing how soon all the crimes committed against the people have been forgotten, even those people like Hugo Chavez who makes billions of dollars off U.S. fuel sales and then funnels those funds to strengthen the very enemy we are at war with.
Agreed, EBA's are nothing new. To some, just the mention of the word portends the demise of the lab. I remember one individual (who still frequents this blog) claimed the lab work force would be down to 4,000 by now. All of the hypothesizing and gesticulating has left me skeptical of the validity of the claims which purport to be fact.
True, but the slide from the "used to have more than 10,000 people" to today's number did occur in just the last two years.
BTW, just how many Bechtel managers do you think are here? The total number of LLNS parent company personnel including managers is less than 60 people total. Lot of UC blood still running things here, including GM.