Skip to main content

America is not broke

Interesting report on how to solve our problems. Makes sense.
Some politicians and their corporate allies dont want the changes.
We do. We can let them know in October 2012.

http://www.ips-dc.org/reports/america_is_not_broke

Comments

thief said…
Yeah because IPS is far more balanced and nuanced than say...faux news.

That's just embarrassing.
Anonymous said…
November 24, 2011 11:46 AM

Well, you are certainly entitled to your opinion. What would be great however, is if you would show where the authors err. It is always easy to say something is wrong,but in a real discussion only arguments count.

Also I am not quite sure what exactly is embarrassing.
Anonymous said…
"Also I am not quite sure what exactly is embarrassing.

November 24, 2011 1:12 PM"

Pleeeze give us a break. Why on earth did this crackpot junk get put on the blog. If you really need to ask why it is embarrassing than you do not deserve to have an answer.
thief said…
Well, you are certainly entitled to your opinion.

Gee thanks...


What would be great however, is if you would show where the authors err.

Feel free to do your own research about IPS. They have a colorful pedigree. Since this blog deals with the labs (nuclear weapons labs....just in case you were fuzzy.) I think that using anything from IPS is laughable. Rest assured zeroing "our" budgets wouldn't give them any sleepless nights at all.

If you want me to show where they err, I'm sure that using references from similar publications on the opposite side of the political spectrum (John Birch Society, etc.) would be just fine with you.


It is always easy to say something is wrong,but in a real discussion only arguments count.

1 point for smug certainty. You've certainly got me here.

Also I am not quite sure what exactly is embarrassing.

Again, cherry picking sources that make you happy. Why didn't you just shovel in a little Michael Moore while you were at it. Were I so inclined, for every IPS position paper that says the US is wallowing in money I think I could probably show you ten...with better credentials...and less dubious histories....that state just the opposite.
Anonymous said…
Still not one single fact or real argument. Just more of the same whining.

If you really need to ask why it is embarrassing than you do not deserve to have an answer.

Judging from your English grammar skills, I am not sure an answer from you would actually be that enlightening.

Pleeeze give us a break. I guess the king has spoken. We are not amused.
Anonymous said…
Judging from your English grammar skills, I am not sure an answer from you would actually be that enlightening.

Pleeeze give us a break. I guess the king has spoken. We are not amused.

November 25, 2011 6:20 AM

I'm always amused how we get all these righteous English teachers on the Blog and then you see them using words like "pleeeze". No, we are not amused, give us a break.
thief said…
Wow...double post! You must really be mad! Go ahead and read the IPS report again! I'm sure you'll feel better.
Anonymous said…
"Still not one single fact or real argument. Just more of the same whining."

There can be no real argument when IPS is involved.

Things like "we can save the US economy by growing more pot" is not a serious proposal.
Anonymous said…
November 25, 2011 6:32 AM

I'm always amused how we get all these righteous English teachers on the Blog and then you see them using words like "pleeeze". No, we are not amused, give us a break.

If you would have followed the posts you would have seen that this was a reference to the previous post from

November 24, 2011 2:14 PM
Anonymous said…
November 26, 2011 3:40 PM

Nice try but just face you got caught in your own trap and someone called you on it.
Anonymous said…
If $14.7T isn't broke, what is?
Anonymous said…
A solution to consider is across the board salary reductions.

1. Boeing reports the F-35 will cost 10% more than budgeted, all employees take a 10% cut in total compensation.

2. California reports a 4% current budget deficit, all state employees take a 4% reduction in total compensation.

3. The current federal deficit is about 20% or revenues, all federal employees and contractors take a 20% pay cut.

Math works, it is manageable, transparent, hits all who benefit equally.

Does this idea have legs, or is it too hard to swallow?

It so why? Public employees are employees who can take their talent to the highest bidder. The public sector is much slower to respond to this idea than the private sector
Anonymous said…
December 2, 2011 4:35 PM

The problem with your "logic" is that we are a representative republic. The people who got us into this were placed in office by the voters, who in many cases decided to keep them there for many terms. Federal employees bear no more responsibility for the debt mess than the rest of us, and shouldn't be the scapegoats. If you don't like what YOUR ELECTED government is doing, GET RID OF THEM. It is YOUR fault.
Anonymous said…
"It so why? "

Maybe it's because they have no command of the English language?
Anonymous said…
It is YOUR fault.

Right. The logic of a woman with a husband to blame or a weak man with a husband.

Either way ignore the problem, the debt, blame others and look for someone else to solve it.

OK. I bite. Reduce total compensation to eliminate the deficit.

Problem solved, and you can go back to being secure and weak.
Anonymous said…
It is your fault.
Anonymous said…
It is your fault.
Anonymous said…
OK. I bite. Reduce total compensation to eliminate the deficit.

Problem solved, and you can go back to being secure and weak.

December 4, 2011 11:14 AM

And that fixes the demographic problems with Social Security and Medicare how?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!