Skip to main content

Dr Chu in trouble!

This breaking news below just in from ABC News. Dr. Chu is in serious trouble. I wonder when the media will start to investigate "Bechtel-gate" and Tom D'Agostino over at the NNSA?:

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/white-house-email-energy-secretary-chu/story?id=14934698#.Tr7ZV_KwVX7

Comments

Anonymous said…
Wow...how will the Labs prosper without Chu's awesome leadership?
Anonymous said…
"Breaking news" about a 10-month-old email? Hardly seems like he's in any imminent danger to me.
Anonymous said…
Dr. Chu will be called to testify in front of a hostile Congress on November 17th.

I doubt Chu will be able to hold his position in DOE much longer. He's become an embarrassment to Obama, who is facing a tough re-election campaign.

Dr. Chu is about to take part of the fall for the Solyndra-gate fiasco and be "thrown under the bus".
Anonymous said…
Chu is going down with Obama next year so this is academic.
Anonymous said…
In business school jargon, there is an organization called a turkey-pen. Expensive, unresponsive, and late, unfocused on the changing business environment. Put someone in there and they turn into a turkey.

DOE is a turkey pen. The stumblebum bureaucrats humble the best.

Time to eliminate the -- in the inimitable style of Governor Rick Perry -- "ah, ah, ah, what was that third one........oh, yeh, the DOE".

Its staff is indeed forgetable.

Take the Nuclear weapons complex to a new agency and junk the remainder.

The organization is asked to do far more than it is capable of.
Anonymous said…
The organization is asked to do far more than it is capable of.

November 15, 2011 10:12 PM

I completely disagree. The problem is that the "organization" has been relegated to a profit organization with the bar (PBIs) so low that it is no longer being challenged. The analogy is the Manhattan Project assigned to perform validation of Newton's Laws using "shoes that grip", management getting bonuses and flashy sports cars for every test or analysis that is performed, and oversight going from one person (General Groves) to several thousand wind-tipped suits (NNSA).
Anonymous said…
Dwight Eisenhower said on his last day in office, "There is nothing a reporter can say that can hurt me."

Chu may not have sent thousands to their deaths and evaded falling bombs by seconds, but my guess is, he is simply too self-assured to be much affected by the opinions of those posturing before him. For he has learned to control himself.

As we competent few know and the hoi polloi still wonders, "Who is John Barth?"
Anonymous said…
As we competent few know and the hoi polloi still wonders, "Who is John Barth?"

November 23, 2011 12:41 PM

Only warmed-over pseudo-intellectual hippies care. No one else gives a crap. Chu is out along with Obama.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!