Skip to main content

Bureaucracy, Labor Woes Doom Super-Weapons Lab

Anonymously contributed:

The story below about the death of Boeing's Super-Weapons Lab will sound *very* familiar to anyone who has been working at LLNL or LANL over the last few years. It probably should get its own top level posing on this blog:

---------
Bureaucracy, Labor Woes Doom Super-Weapons Lab

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/11/mega-weapons-lab/

Comments

Anonymous said…
This is classic and all too familiar:

A series of corporate missteps doomed the lab, Lamont said. He blamed Boeing’s marketing department for adding unnecessary layers of bureaucracy to Building 31. “Customers who were used to plainly walking in and fixing the U.S. government’s issues now had multiple departments and skyrocketing costs to deal with.”

The bureaucracy drove up costs, according to Gary Quick, a longtime lab employee. “It’s an inverted pyramid that’s got us at the pointed end — and it’s crushing us,” Quick, a diver trained to recover rocket parts, told Danger Room.
Anonymous said…
An overpaid, bloated management team that lives off the increasingly complex bureaucracy they create.

Hey, Boeing... We, the for-profit NNSA labs, did it first! We are a Center of Excellence at it.
Anonymous said…
I guess there is some strange comfort in knowing we are not the only US weapons research lab that is being run into the ground.

God help this nation in the future. We are destroying our nation's national security research capabilities at a truly frightening rate! Only the slick PR material remains.
Anonymous said…
The "inverted pyramid" at LANL will soon consist of 9,999 managers and just 1 technical staff member who is on direct funding and does the lab's scientific research. LANS will like it that way as it will make the lab much easier to manage!

However, the last remaining direct-funded TSM is going to have an incredibly high labor rate due to the overhead burden.

I guess upper management will then decide they need to get cut this poor TSM's pension and benefits to compensate for his high labor costs.
Anonymous said…
You guys don't get it the so called bureaucracy is modern management that leads to increased efficiency. Boeing is in the business of making money. If this was so great they would keep it, apparently it was not.
Anonymous said…
You guys don't get it the so called bureaucracy is modern management that leads to increased efficiency. (6:55 am)

Those must be some mighty powerful medications you're taking, 6:55! They do a wonderful job blocking out the dismal reality that is evident around the "new and improved" LLC run labs.
Anonymous said…
Super weapons?

One of many similar development labs.... a good one, but one with many competitors in a field where performance matters less than campaign donations and beltway nimbleness..(and perhaps the talent of the escorts provided to congressional staff).

This is a place whose employees took a gamble, and unfortunately, struck. Withholding services emphasizes the value of those services.

These were found wanting or duplicated.

Gamble failed.
Anonymous said…
These were found wanting or duplicated. Gamble failed.

December 2, 2011 4:17 PM


How little you know, 4:17pm. These are the patriot scientists who developed the secretive Boeing X-37 mini-shuttle. This shuttle was designed for missions that only last a few weeks or months but this innovative mini-shuttle has now been in continuous service for over 250 days and may stay up for a full year protecting American vital interests.

Do some research before sizing up things you know little about with your attitude of arrogance.
Anonymous said…
"Do some research before sizing up things you know little about with your attitude of arrogance." ?

Did I miss something in the article? Talented employees went on strike for 90 days, during that time the sponsor cancelled future work.

Misread it?
Anonymous said…
"Misread it?

December 5, 2011 1:42 PM"

Boeing also took a gamble and judging from how they are doing right now they lost.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!