Skip to main content

LANS Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program?

Anonymously contributed:

LANS Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program?

Does anyone have any information of a VRIP at LANS slated for April 2012 at LANS and LLNS? It looks like LANS is lining their ducks (e.g. creating RIF lists) for major a VRIP and/or RIF based on a significant budget reduction for FY 2012. This is also based on the possibility of automatic "across the board" super-committee budget cuts. MacMillan will be speaking to this on November 15.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I have heard nothing about a VRIP but I know management at LANL has been told to start identifying employees for separation.

I am not sure if this is just the super-committee cuts, it could also be that some cuts will be coming even if the super-committee comes through. Not much we can do about this so just keep doing your jobs and always have a plan B.
Anonymous said…
Wow...if *only* there was some massive, bloated, risk-averse bureaucrats and overhead to cut!
Anonymous said…
Cut the lab's bloated overhead? Never!

We paid good money to have the Bechtel business "experts" come in and take over the labs so that they could load us down with bloated overhead and a new army of over-paid upper management.

We can't waste all those hard gained "benefits" now, can we? Besides, all the politicos in New Mexico love receiving GRT taxes for their pet projects.

No, we'll just have to start laying off more of the direct-funded technical staff to help defuse this crisis. We can then follow this up by raising overhead rates on any remaining projects once funding disappears with the loss of technical staff.

It's our only hope! Only more Bechtel management and more restrictive lab policies can save us.
Anonymous said…
There will be no voluntary "3-3" type program to mitigate the pain of NNSA lab downsizing. Too many people at LLNL and LANL are still living in the past. Those days are over. You'll be lucky if you even see any severance payments.

I would expect LANS and LLNS upper management to enact a "stealth" program that begins targeting staff for mass firings so that they can minimize the cost of laying off workers.

No severance, no unemployment, no nuth'in. Just a single box in hand to take out your personnel items as you are suddenly escorted out the gates by the lab security force.
Anonymous said…
I would expect LANS and LLNS upper management to enact a "stealth" program that begins targeting staff for mass firings so that they can minimize the cost of laying off workers.

November 13, 2011 9:38 AM

"Targeting staff". The environment Knapp has been thriving in for 5-years. To name a few targets: Matsumoto, Aubert, Smith, Valicenti, Garcia, Hsu, Konecni, Hinkley, Romero, Trujillo, Salgado, Trujillo, Romero, Bailey, Martinez, Trujillo. Three Trujillo's and two Romero's. You don't have a chance if your surname ends in a vowel. No surprise, he did these stunts "at Livermore".
Anonymous said…
"November 13, 2011 9:38 AM"

I have to agree with this. The labs are a different place now.
Anonymous said…
Bret Knapp just loves Los Alamos because he considers it a "target rich environment" with all the minorities.
Anonymous said…
Food for thought: The only thriving nuclear weapon labs these days are in Iran, North Korea, Pakistan and Russia. Not exactly US friendly states.

The American and British nuclear weapon programs are in steep decline from where they were over a decade ago but the Brits seem to be in a little bit better shape than the Americans at the moment.

Most members of Congress have no idea how much damage they have done to the US nuke labs over the last decade. It appears more damage is coming...
Anonymous said…
When the labs are allowed to carry out underground tests again, they can quickly reverse the decline.

Until then, the non-weapons distractions remain and obscure the need to modernize the complex to energize the next generation of scientists.

LLNL now, is lead by someone who might be well connected, but who cannot guide scientific performance discussions, nor judge candidates for key leadership roles.
Anonymous said…
When the labs are allowed to carry out underground tests again, they can quickly reverse the decline.

November 15, 2011 10:20 PM

And who is left with the knowledge and experience to perform a UGT? Those folks are either dead, retired, RIFed, or forced out of the nuclear weapon program. We no longer have the capability to execute a UGT!
Anonymous said…
And who is left with the knowledge and experience to perform a UGT? Those folks are either dead, retired, RIFed, or forced out of the nuclear weapon program. We no longer have the capability to execute a UGT!

November 20, 2011 4:54 AM

You are correct. It used to be, not so long ago, that people lamented that no one any longer in the weapons program had witnessed an above-ground test, so lacked any feel for the power of nuclear weapons. Now, no one left has even conducted an underground test, so lacks the ability to carry one out. Once the Islamic world gains nuclear weapons beyond the rudimentary stage, the US is dead. We will be fighting nuclear attacks with remote drone strikes. One US city destroyed for one terrorist killed, or one dud US attempt at a nuclear strike.
Anonymous said…
Money is a key ingredient in motivating employees to higher performance levels. But how do you develop a incentive program that stimulates high production levels with employees? I only prefer Bukoo Gifts if you are searching for someone to setup best Employee Incentive Programs.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!