Skip to main content

Lujan votes against funding NNSA

Lujan votes against funding NNSA When times get tough, it is hard to know who to count as a friend. The list of votes tells the story, and it is not a pretty one for the northern NM economy. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2013/roll542.xml

Comments

Anonymous said…
No, not Ben Ray! Say it ain't so.
Anonymous said…
Ben is a loser. He isn't half the man his father was.
Anonymous said…
The sequester is supposed to evenly cut all federal spending. The GOP wants to approve spending on things they like, which means things they don't like will get even larger cuts. Dems are not playing that game.
Anonymous said…
October 15, 2013 at 10:36 AM

And Lujan's vote against funding for NNSA spoke loud about what he likes. Even though he voted against funding for NNSA he still will not draw a credible challenge in his next election. The days when you could count on a politician to vote for what was best for their local district are distant memories. Lujan gets his voting orders from Pelosi, not from northern NM residents.
Anonymous said…
"The days when you could count on a politician to vote for what was best for their local district are distant memories."

Well that becomes the focal point of the national problem. With every politician attempting to bring home the bacon to their local constituents, it becomes a barter system in Washington. I'll vote for your bacon if you'll vote for mine. And that is exactly how we pile up the debt.

Doing things for the national good, well sometimes I think that is a distant memory. Where's my pie?
Anonymous said…
Lujan gets his voting orders from Pelosi, not from northern NM residents.

October 15, 2013 at 11:32 AM

As long as your name is "Lujan" and you represent a majority-Hispanic district, you can't lose.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!