Skip to main content

LIVERMORE LAB PAYS $37.25 MILLION IN SETTLEMENT

LIVERMORE LAB PAYS $37.25 MILLION IN SETTLEMENT

Here is the LLNL press release that went out to characterize the settlement to the media. Interestingly, as of 4:30 PM today, this is not posted on the LLNL website with the other press releases - even though it was sent out to select media hours ago. Here it is.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 30, 2015
NR-15-09-08


SETTLEMENT REACHED IN CASE BROUGHT BY LAID-OFF
WORKERS AGAINST LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY

The claims of 129 of the plaintiffs in the long-running lawsuit brought by 130 former workers against the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have been resolved through a settlement under which the Laboratory has agreed to pay the former employees a total of $37.25 million in contract damages.

The lawsuit arose out of a 2008 workforce restructuring at the Laboratory, which impacted more than 1,000 employees. In 2013, the claims of five “test plaintiffs,” out of the 130, were litigated in two separate jury trials. The first trial, alleging breach of the plaintiffs’ employment contracts, resulted in a victory for the five test plaintiffs and a damages award of $2.73 million. The Laboratory prevailed in the second trial, which alleged that the Laboratory had discriminated against older employees in making layoff decisions.

While both jury verdicts were on appeal, and with the encouragement of Judge Robert Freedman of the Alameda County Superior Court, the parties engaged in a months-long mediation that resulted in the settlement announced today. One plaintiff did not settle her case. The Laboratory continues to deny any wrongdoing in connection with the circumstances underlying the work force reduction.

J. Gary Gwilliam of Gwilliam, Ivary, Chiosso, Cavalli and Brewer of Oakland, California, represented the workers.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is operated for the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, which was the named defendant in the lawsuit.

Founded in 1952, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (www.llnl.gov) provides solutions to our nation’s most important national security challenges through innovative science, engineering and technology. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is managed by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration.

- END -

Laboratory news releases and photos are also available at https://www.llnl.gov/news/newsreleases/


Comments

Anonymous said…
Great job folks. I was a heartbroken, brow beaten engineering manager during this layoff and was ashamed of the way so many fine people were treated. Well done. Your frog March from your jobs en mass was a humam resources blunder. UC employees would nevrr have allowed such disgraceful treatment. LLNS, bastardized by ignorant , lazy, poor quality industry flunkees like Russo and Soderstrom, bullshited and bullied sensible managers into this shameful insult. Kudos in clearing your good name.

This was brought about by the privatization blunder lead by the ultimate liar,v Tyler Pryzbylek. I wish hatred, disesse and damnation for this for his mass abuse the new contact wrought of so many fine, innocent. people,.

May he, Russo and Soderstrom look into the mirror and see themselves with the disgust hold them, and may they end their own lives.
Anonymous said…
"LLNS, bastardized by ignorant , lazy, poor quality industry flunkees like Russo and Soderstrom, bullshited and bullied sensible managers into this shameful insult."

Nicely said, bravo !

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!