Skip to main content

Benefits question

I am a retiree of Llnl. I have Kaiser and cover my spouse under Kaiser senior avantage. I am not medicare eligible but my spouse is.
I received a statement from Emperian yesterday. It said that my Kaiser contribution is still $81 a month in 2017 as 2016. But my spouse portion will cost $425 a month with Kaiser Senior Advantage, begining Jan. 2017 instead of $210 in 2016.
Does anyone has the same situation as mine? Meaning the spouse cost portion increased more than doubled.
Thanks for any information I can get.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You are getting the wrong information. Maybe you confused Empyrean ?

Kaiser Medicare advance for your wife/domestic partner alone should be $212.50/month for 2017. LLNL will give you most if not all of that back per month as a subsidy. I think the subsidy for 2017 is $210/month for your partner. Your real cost will be to pay for CMS Medicare for your wife which will cost $183.20/month depending on your joint income. (I just wrote the check for November !) Could be slightly less or a lot more. Since you are not yet Medicare eligible you end up paying less for Kaiser, since you are in the Non-Medicare LLNL Group Plan.

You will find that Medicare is NOT a good deal except for the fact that LLNL provides a $420/month subsidy when you are both eligible. If your retirement income is low, you depend solely on Social Security, then of course Medicare is a great deal !
Anonymous said…
Let me also add that my grown children are paying from $250 to $325 per month each out of pocket for Kaiser under the Affordable Care Act, for coverage with huge deductibles. We haven't checked how these Kaiser Northern CA rates will go up for 2017. Afraid to actually see a doctor about any problems !
Anonymous said…
Just got my non-Medicare Kaiser info for next year. Rates for Kaiser are unchanged for the third year in a row. Not low priced, but I'm happy how the rates have not changed.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!