Sunday, October 2, 2016
Science still alive and well at LANL
I believe science is still alive at LANL but running under the radar. I do agree since the end of nuclear testing there has been a migration away from an absolute need for a deterrent. I also believe this is a long term mistake. Webster as director would be interesting. He seems genuine enough. I can't speak for his management ability but sometimes I find that particular ability to be overrated. Know he mission, support the mission. That should be the basis for truth telling.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LLNS Contract discussion
SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE
Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...
2 comments:
Webster? Seriously??
He is McMillan's latest suck-up, but is there anything else qualifying about him?
Webster? Seriously?
Post a Comment