This may result in even less LEP work for LLNL and even more reliance on NIF funding to keep the doors open.
"In February 2017, DOD and NNSA representatives agreed to use the term “IW1” rather than “W78/88-1 LEP” to reflect that IW1 replaces capability rather than extending the life of current stockpile systems."
http://allthingsnuclear.org/syoung/the-ugly-post-3-of-the-nnsas-fy2018-budget-request
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LLNS Contract discussion
SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE
Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...
-
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will have a huge negative effect on the ...
-
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises t...
-
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref...
4 comments:
Inoperable Warhead 1. Just what the country needs.
Inoperable Warhead 1. Just what the country needs.
June 10, 2017 at 2:27 AM
The beauty of of it is that no one will ever know without a nuclear test. Trump's fake nuclear weapons.
So what makes IW1 different from the Reliable Replacment Warhead (RRW) that was scuttled by the powers that be?
The Frankenbomb lives! It's alive!
Post a Comment