Skip to main content

What some people think of blog

https://www.quora.com/Lawrence-Livermore-National-Laboratory-Is-LLNL-the-true-story-generally-on-point-or-way-off-base

Comments

Anonymous said…
Well, any top post that says anything serious about nuclear weapons, weapons research (except of course NIF), testing, etc. generally gets completely ignored. Posts that complain about just about anything or anyone (NNSA, LLNS, LANS, Charlie, management in general, etc.) get dozens if not scores of comments. It seems to me at least, that most posters on this blog do not (or no longer) work at LLNL or LANL, or are lower-level employees without much understanding or concern for the labs' mission.
Anonymous said…
Lower-level? In what respect?
Anonymous said…
Technicians, admins, and clerks. I.e., below professional staff members whose education and experience/expertise are gained along with a certain breadth of world-view and who view their function with slightly less myopia and self-interest. Got it?
Anonymous said…
Going to college doesn't impart a world view? Travelling the world like many scientists and engineers doesn't either? Collaboration with people from all over the world?

You got it totally wrong. Scientists have exactly as valid of world views as non-scientists. Let me guess, you are a bitter loser. Am I right?
Anonymous said…
Where have you been in the last 20 vears? One's profession no longer reflect one's worldliness. Some of the most informed people are admins, technicians and clerks. O know people who have multiple degrees and who are druggies and derelicts.
Anonymous said…
You don't need to have a PhD to see the big picture. In fact, sometimes having a PhD is an obstacle to seeing the big picture.

Glassdoor is a joke, by the way. Talk about bitter losers, you either get former employees with grudges slamming the lab, or current employees who want to kiss management's ass by "anonymously" talking about what a great place it is.
Anonymous said…
To many assumptions here. June 11, 2017 at 5:16 PM is not June 11, 2017 at 7:13 PM. Also, June 11, 2017 at 5:55 PM totally missed the point of June 11, 2017 at 5:16 PM. Typical for this blog.
Anonymous said…
Actually, if you must know, I am a retired physicist from LANL, who is entirely happy with my tenure there and I am enjoying a very generous UC pension. You have also misread my original post (June 11, 2017 at 5:16 PM). Go read it again.
Anonymous said…
Sorry, maybe YOU need to re-read your idiotic post again. "With a certain breadth of world-view". "View their position with slightly less myopia and self-interest"?

You're trying to draw a distinction between staff at different levels that simply does not exist.
Anonymous said…
If you put 10 people in a room, 10 people from all walks of life, you'll have 10 different world-views. All educated people don't think alike and educated people have world-views that are exactly as valid as anyone else's.

Indeed this is why people cannot speak to each other, drive cars, walk, interact, or function in society. Every view is personal, every narrative could be true and there is no way to talk to one another or even communicate. Just look at this blog.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...