Skip to main content

NEVADA under protest

 Nevada is under protest,again https://www.gao.gov/docket/B-414750.1
https://govtribe.com/vendor/asec-international-incorporated-gaithersburg-md

Comments

Anonymous said…
Leidos must not need any government contracts. Now, they have twice tried to bite the hand that feeds them, which will certainly influence their future prospects working for .gov.
Anonymous said…
Any more talk on NNSS coming under SNL's wing?
Anonymous said…
Never heard that. SNL does not do much at NNSS. Given that a 5-10 year contract was just awarded, it does not appear to be a current line of thinking by NNSA.
Anonymous said…
Leidos must not need any government contracts. Now, they have twice tried to bite the hand that feeds them, which will certainly influence their future prospects working for .gov.

June 3, 2017 at 6:14 PM

Don't know much about government contracting, do we? If you did, you would be aware that some of the largest government contractors file numerous bid award protests with the GAO.
Anonymous said…
Leidos must not need any government contracts. Now, they have twice tried to bite the hand that feeds them, which will certainly influence their future prospects working for .gov.

June 3, 2017 at 6:14 PM

Don't know much about government contracting, do we? If you did, you would be aware that some of the largest government contractors file numerous bid award protests with GAO.
Anonymous said…
Past posting
Thursday, December 22, 201

Per the last two sentences of Sec J Amd 1, the new SNL manager needs to claim it is ready to assume full responsibility for NNSS before it can also take over SNL.

https://nnsa.energy.gov/aboutus/ouroperations/apm/majcontrsolicitation/snlcomp/final-solicitation-document-de-sol-0008470

https://nnsa.energy.gov/sites/default/files/nnsa/multiplefiles/SEC%20J_Appendix%20J%20-%20Transition%20Plan%20Amd%201.pdf
Anonymous said…
An interesting find. So Lockheed won NNSS on assumption it would win SNL, but Leidos was not a player in the SNL bid, and the sale of the contract to Leidos threw a wrench into the plan. Honeywell won SNL, and then won NNSS because it had won SNL and had also bid on NNSS.
Anonymous said…
That is obviously a typo. What is next? Elvis is alive and well with aliens?
Anonymous said…
There is proof of that.
Anonymous said…
A second GAO protest has been submitted by the Northrup bid team. https://www.gao.gov/docket/B-414750.2
Anonymous said…
Where does it say Northrop? How do you know it is Northrop?
Anonymous said…
The NNSS reference in the Sandia RFP was a typo that was corrected in a later amendment. They copied the clause from the NNSS RFP.
Anonymous said…
Washington Bureaucrats at work. Dump them, Mr. Trump, as you promised to do --- "drain the swamp". !
Anonymous said…
So, another year delay?
Anonymous said…
Honeywell at Kansas City, Sandia and Nevada.
Anonymous said…
There was an email at nestec saying a ruling is expected in September. So, guaranteed that nothing will happen until after Oct. 1.
Anonymous said…
Why protest? Do they recind contracts because of protests?
Anonymous said…
It has happened but rarely. The probability of success in changing the award is low while the probability of making NNSA/DOE mad is high. DOE is good at "boiler plating" their selection process to avoid changing the award.
Anonymous said…
It would be interesting to know how much DOE and the bidders have spent on this contract. Probably not a "best value" process.
Anonymous said…


Why protest? Do they recind contracts because of protests?

June 9, 2017 at 11:56 PM


If you are the current contractor and the NNSA picks someone else to take over, then you get to keep on running the show until all the protests are over, and then 90 days after the last appeal is timed out. Not a bad proposition to keep paying all your high level managers their big salaries, even if they eventually will have to move out.
Anonymous said…
And the decline, er, transformation continues...
Anonymous said…
Are you suggesting NG's reason to protest is to make more fee and keep high paid managers employed?
Anonymous said…
Are you suggesting NG's reason to protest is to make more fee and keep high paid managers employed?

June 11, 2017 at 6:44 PM

That occurred to me as well, more fee and continued high pay for people who will be sent packing eventually. Win, win, why not protest even if you have no basis for protesting and you know you will lose.
Anonymous said…
Our tax dollars at work. Drain the swamp.
Anonymous said…
Who are you pretending is listening to you when you bray your mantra of "drain the swamp"? Hint: NO ONE. Trump IS the swamp. He makes it deeper and murkier every day, every time he embarrasses himself with his inane and insane tweets. Sad. Presidents over a hundred years ago learned to just shut up. He is Obama all over again, except less sane, and way less knowledgeable.
Anonymous said…
Now even the ProForce contract is being protested,,, https://www.gao.gov/docket/B-414800.1
Anonymous said…
The expression "drain the swamp" came on long before Donald Trump. I remember hearing it at Pratt & Whitney Florida Research and Development Facility (FRDC) outside West Palm Beach in 1970. The comment that DOE HQ needs help is independent of 2017 politics. Chill out!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!