This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
Stay on topic.
No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
NO NAME CALLING.
No political debate.
Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Friday, August 4, 2017
Future of for-profit LANL
If the for profit model will remain for the foreseeable future, what can we do within this construct to make for a better Los Alamos National Laboratory?
There are not, and never have been, "employees of Los Alamos National Laboratory." There were employees of UC, then there were employees of LANS. Pay attention to who signs your paycheck.
7:58 AM , more than considering that.... A community of distinguished persons and the consensus is becoming that we would rather just rant at each other rather than have productive discussions.
Now, now it isn't nice to pick on McMillan, Bishop, Webster, Wallace and Leasure. While it may be correct that that they are all UC lifers, it isn't their fault that LANL has fallen on bad times. Face it, they did the best that they could and just were not up to the requirements of the job.
Now, now it isn't nice to pick on McMillan, Bishop, Webster, Wallace and Leasure. While it may be correct that that they are all UC lifers, it isn't their fault that LANL has fallen on bad times. Face it, they did the best that they could and just were not up to the requirements of the job.
9 comments:
Define 'we.'
The employees of Los Alamos National Laboratory. Or we can continue with the victim-hood mentality.
There are not, and never have been, "employees of Los Alamos National Laboratory." There were employees of UC, then there were employees of LANS. Pay attention to who signs your paycheck.
*Sigh* We will never have a serious blog....
*Sigh* We will never have a serious blog....
August 6, 2017 at 12:03 AM
You should consider that you might be the only person here who wants one.
7:58 AM , more than considering that.... A community of distinguished persons and the consensus is becoming that we would rather just rant at each other rather than have productive discussions.
Let the inmates run the asylum.....sounds like a fine idea.
What could possibly go wrong with that?
Now, now it isn't nice to pick on McMillan, Bishop, Webster, Wallace and Leasure. While it may be correct that that they are all UC lifers, it isn't their fault that LANL has fallen on bad times. Face it, they did the best that they could and just were not up to the requirements of the job.
Now, now it isn't nice to pick on McMillan, Bishop, Webster, Wallace and Leasure. While it may be correct that that they are all UC lifers, it isn't their fault that LANL has fallen on bad times. Face it, they did the best that they could and just were not up to the requirements of the job.
Post a Comment