Skip to main content

No one wanted to keep the present team.

Others may want to add in as they wish, but there were usual suspects at the NNSA bidders day. UC, Bechtel,BWTX, UT and others showed up to the event. About all that was clear is that no one wanted to keep the present team.

Comments

Anonymous said…
From the Exchange Monitor:

The University of Texas is exploring a bid to manage the Los Alamos National Laboratory after receiving the green light Thursday from its Board of Regents. The regents approved bid preparations that could cost up to $4.5 million in a Thursday meeting at the University
Anonymous said…
BWXT?
Really out to lunch on that happening. They lost Y-12 contract after the 82 year old nun made it all the way to the uranium facility and banged on the wall with a hammer and spray painted graffiti on the wall. Then they really ticked off NNSA by protesting the contract for way over a year. NNSA has a clear bias against these problem contractors and it showed at the Sandia contract when the BWXT team was the lowest ranked of all teams bidding.
Anonymous said…
Any other interest? This list looks like a reunion, not a contract bid walk.
Anonymous said…
If not, expect a significant RFP change including an up in profit/fee to 3%.
Anonymous said…
BWXT also lost the Kansas City competition and lost the NNSS completion in both the initial round and the final round after the contract award was rescinded from Leidos.

Is Leidos bidding for LANL?
Anonymous said…
Expect Ray Juzaitis to play into the UT bid, another ego.
Anonymous said…
The problem is that there are zero good people out there with experience. The usual suspects try to beautify the pig by putting lipstick on it. Just look at Charlie/LANS and their recent hires: Gibbs and Wantuck. Two old LANL people from a past equally troubled as the present. Charlie didn't look to th UC base, so any UC bid will not be successful cause the good people just don't exist. Bechtel never set its best people to LANS because it wasn't financially lucrative. LANL served its purpose for Bechtel by becoming a dumping ground for its C students. BWXT and URS have destroyed TA55 to the point that no work can be done, safe or otherwise. NNSA should have told these folks to stay for the free refreshments at the open house but don't bother to apply.
Anonymous said…
Well if these are the players then it is just going to be a shuffling of team members. You will need a University, an operator, and an infrastructure manager.... The only of those variables with 2 participants appears to be UC and UT.... This could get to the point of 2 bids max. Expect RFP changes to attract more bidders.
Anonymous said…
The only of those variables with 2 participants appears to be UC and UT.... This could get to the point of 2 bids max. Expect RFP changes to attract more bidders.

I doubt they want more bidders since it is going to be one of these two. One of the issue was that if the fee is to high you are going to get the wrong kind of groups bidding. NNSA has stated that want to return to a service oriented model rather than a profit motive model.
Anonymous said…
Owen is another recent AD hire.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!