Skip to main content

Dead blog?

Is the blog dead? Too bad it was fun and informative.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Dead? I did not know that.
Anonymous said…
A blog is mostly driven by comments, and someone willing to maintain it of course. While one might quibble with the efficacy of the upkeep, the problem would seem to be a lack of interest as evidenced by active comments and discussion.
Anonymous said…
Anu suggestions to make it more interesting ?
Anonymous said…

A single thread use to get up 60 or more posts if you look the postings from last year.
Sometime around Nov the number of posts dropped by 10. I think it use to be you could post and see your comment right away so you could have a much faster back and forth, now you have to wait a day or more to see if you post will even appear and often it does not for whatever reason.
doobydew said…
Wrong ! I publish posts and comments several times a day , as advertised .
Anonymous said…
I sometimes wait as long as 24 hours to see my posts. "Several times a day" might be true some days but it isn't true every day.
Anonymous said…
OK. This is a best effort service. You don't expect your post to be up instantly, do you ?
Anonymous said…
The slowdown seems to have started when Wallace came in at LANL. Maybe related to his minions loss of McMillan as a favorite target?
Anonymous said…
Explain how that would slow down postings on the blog???
Anonymous said…
OK. This is a best effort service. You don't expect your post to be up instantly, do you ?

July 19, 2018 at 6:02 AM

OK, not a clue what that means. "Best" in the sense that's the best the moderator can do? Or "best" in the sense if it's the best blog out there for rapidity of postings? I suspect the former and that is obviously a pretty low bar for quality of service. Like everything else in the world, you get what you pay for and it's worth every penny.
scooby said…
Since you know you get what you pay for , why are you complaining hey ?
Anonymous said…

Why are there so few postings and comments this year compared to last?

The most obvious answer is that there is nothing wrong at Livermore. Also, most everyone is happy with how smoothly the contract change at LANL is proceeding. And, Sandia is cooking right along under the new management. Nothing to complain about equals fewer postings and comments. But,you'll probably see an uptick in squawks once the new benefits package is released at LANL.
Anonymous said…
The less obvious, but more probable, reason, is that this blog is just less interesting, due to posting delays and less tolerance from the moderators of strong opinion. Moderators create moderation, in every aspect of the blog, including interesting and provocative content. The interesting (if provocative) posters go elsewhere.
Anonymous said…
Anu suggestions to make it more interesting ?
Anonymous said…
How about the moderators slack off a bit and allow more provocative content? What will it hurt (except their feelings)?? Scooby's favorite "don't let the door hit you..." comment should also apply to people offended by provocative content. The borderline between interesting and boring is slim, and a strict, controlling moderator never helps a boring blog, but may wind up with a silent one. If you want technically accurate, politically neutral, and socially correct, accept the fact that almost no one else does on an anonymous blog. It has been shown many times over the yeas here, that most posters have some sort of ax to grind. Nature of the beast.
Anonymous said…
The present watered down version of what was once a lively discussion can be blamed on the Evil Weevil, who, like most do gooders, imposed her will and then dissapeared.

Anonymous said…
its blog burnout, brought on by the fear of Bechtel staying on, folk were desperate for information and hung on every post. Now that pressure is gone, people are taking a break.
GreggS said…
You want me back?

I helped get rid of the trolls that swamped the forum. Scooby and I had clearly published rules and we followed those ruled rigorously - no hate speech or personal attacks. No personal opinions from either of us came into the fray unless we overtly posted our own entry stating those thoughts.

Of course the volume went down after the troll postings were suppressed. What was left is the true interest group for the labs. If that is dwindling then it's dwindling.

You're entitled to blame me all you want - this forum, Trump being president, global warming, any other delusions you may have. I'll smile just as sweetly, signing my name to the posts unlike you, Dr. Anonymous.
Anonymous said…
Yikes, just go away already! Sheesh! No one needs you or wants you.
Anonymous said…
I'll smile just as sweetly, signing my name to the posts unlike you, Dr. Anonymous.

July 27, 2018 at 4:09 PM

One can only notice that you do not, in fact, sign your name to your posts, using a catchy pseudonym instead. Unlike Scooby, who has come clean as Julian.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!