Bechtel Faces Two Lawsuits from Former Employees at Hanford
"Two former workers at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment Plant are accusing contractor Bechtel National in separate lawsuits of laying them off after they raised safety concerns...In millwright Ford’s case, the Department of Labor ruled in 2015 that his role as a whistleblower during his 35-year career at Hanford contributed to Bechtel’s decision to lay him off in November 2011. He was scrutinized and treated more harshly than other employees, the agency found."
https://www.exchangemonitor.com/bechtel-faces-two-lawsuits-former-employees-hanford/
"Two former workers at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment Plant are accusing contractor Bechtel National in separate lawsuits of laying them off after they raised safety concerns...In millwright Ford’s case, the Department of Labor ruled in 2015 that his role as a whistleblower during his 35-year career at Hanford contributed to Bechtel’s decision to lay him off in November 2011. He was scrutinized and treated more harshly than other employees, the agency found."
https://www.exchangemonitor.com/bechtel-faces-two-lawsuits-former-employees-hanford/
Comments
There are two answers to this.
(1) Los Alamos is a winner but the DOE awards are total junk so it means nothing because we know how bad Los Alamos is.
(2) If Los Alamos did not win anything than it shows how horrible Los Alamos is that it did not win anything.
Ok I think we are all in agreement.
There is a 3rd answer. The decade plus experiment with the expensive for-profit focused contractors LANS and LLNS (LANSLLNS), has been an across the board colossal failure with respect to DOE mission objectives. Are you listening NNSA?
A completely logical argument can have misspellings and even grammatical errors.
https://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/local/hanford/article116759823.html
Again this does not invalidate an argument. In fact to dismiss argument using this approach invokes two logical fallacies.
November 23, 2018 at 8:36 PM
So what? It is still dismissed. Is that what the poster wants? No one cares about your "logical fallacies." Your fallacy is in thinking they are important. Get over yourself.
Impressive, you invoke two fallacies just 11 words.
Ad Hominem Fallacy
Irrelevant conclusion.
I would add that you are also clearly wrong when you claim "no one cares about your" since you have demonstrated that at least one person cares.
I delete comments that violate blog rules, period. If you don't agree, stay away .
Appeal to authority, but than again you are in fact the authority.
You failed an experiment I tried a while ago. I copied an offensive sentence from a blog post that you let through with one change, I made you the subject. You censured the post.
You claim that you only delete comments that violate blog rules just isn't true. You also delete comments that you don't like. Get over yourself.
November 26, 2018 at 6:56 PM
It is his blog and he calls the shots.
What was wrong with the 5:33PM post? There is a difference between an insult and a suggestion. I think you are bit sensitive. Get over yourself ;)
November 26, 2018 at 6:56 PM
So you think that everyone shares your definition of "offensive"? I'm offended by that opinion!
November 27, 2018 at 6:06 PM
So what? It is still offensive. Is that what the poster wants? No one cares about you think is offensive. Your offense is in thinking what offends you is important. Get over yourself.
If everything offends you ,you must be a very miserable person. I am sincerely hoping you are joking .
"...and we have yet another thread about Julian. See the pattern? Anyone? Anyone?",
November 29, 2018 at 1:08 AM
Yes, I see a patten, you attack someone who disagrees with you points of view, the person replies to your attack with logic, you then reply in return by insulting the person with words that violate the blog rules which gets removed. You then blame Julian for not allowing your post. So yes the threads leads to Julian, so indeed there is a pattern and it is one everyone sees but you. Think about the for bit.
Even if this is true it is not a pattern not to mention that I am pretty sure that it did happen as you say since you kinda have a history of
not exactly being very accurate. But hey you can see the world the way you want.
"Not the case, 6:56 pm. What you don't know, and apparently didn't think to consider, is there is more than one person accusing Julian of inconsistent censureship in this thread."
I will invoke the Anna Krarenina argument, all happy posters are different but all unhappy posters are the same. In other words the pattern is the same, you guys post something that violates the rules, it does not get posted and you are unhappy. Everyone else posts something things that never get removed.
So a few supposedly bickering commenters have effectively drawn attention away from the original post topic. Hmm.
November 29, 2018 at 6:30 PM
I guess the concepts of sarcasm and exaggeration to make a point are not in Julian's repertoire.
People...... politicians have destroyed the golden goose.... LLNL and LANL...
Its over, get used to the mediocrity of Bechtel and its politically entrenched deep state status...No one gives a crap anymore....The labs have been sold out by Bay Area politicians.
The once greatest think tanks that brought the first generation of innovation and grew out of WWII are dead and gone. NNSA is a joke.