Skip to main content

Where is Waldo (Terry Wallace)?

Where is Waldo (Terry Wallace)?

Comments

Anonymous said…

Not sure where he is but I think he is still around. He seemed very bitter the last few months with LANS. Kinda of strange, I would think he would be happy that he got something at least. I guess he really thought that he should be the Director for years and years. Someone pointed out just how vindictive he is, so I think he blames others for why LANS fails. My guess he felt that he was always going to be the next Director after McMillian but it would be with LANS for 5-10 years. LANS was thrown out and that was that so someone is at fault.
Anonymous said…
Wallace should not make the mistake of several recent and not-so-recent Directors, of comparing themselves favorably with Oppenheimer, Bradbury, Agnew, Hecker, and even Browne (forget Kerr). Not in the same class, not even close. Wallace's Mommy's influence got him his upper management job, not his (lack of) qualifications.
Anonymous said…
That last part is quite an extrapolation.
Terry has a new office, and was in DC this week helping with transition related discussions.
Anonymous said…
Wallace was far better than any of the three Livermore carpetbaggers. He was also far better than Nanos and Kerr. That puts him right in the middle with Brown. Neither he nor Brown ever understood the mission of the Lab. Neither he nor Brown had the necessary background. He had far fewer “incidents” under his watch and handled them well. Edge to Wallace. Admittedly, that’s a pretty low bar, but the days of Bradbury and Agnew are long gone. Mason will be fighting for a middle seat in this bimodal distribution. Unless he is a total screw up, his legacy there is all but guaranteed.
Anonymous said…
"Wallace was far better than any of the three Livermore carpetbaggers."

Ok that is true so at least Wallace is a zero rather than a negative.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...