Skip to main content

Nuclear Weapons are now illegal !!

Image
By


https://losalamosreporter.com/2021/01/23/ban-treaty-nuclear-weapons-are-new-illegal/

January 22, 2021 will go down in history as the day when the tide turned against nuclear weapons. That’s the day when the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons went into effect, signed by 122 countries. It specifically prohibits nations from developing, testing, using or threatening to use nuclear weapons and assisting others in doing so. It reinforces existing international law obligating all states not to test, use or threaten to use nuclear weapons.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I’m pretty sure the US is not a party to this farce.
1/25/2021 2:30 PM
Anonymous said…
Pfftt! If it isn't a US law or ratified Treaty, it is not "illegal," except in some liberals' fever dream.
1/25/2021 5:05 PM
Anonymous said…
Big Whoop. Look at the list and you will note that none of the countries that have nuclear weapons signed this treaty. Israel who has not stated they have them (they do) did not sign. Iran and Iraq did not sign. And what will the countries that did sign do to those that didn't. Will they stop trade with the U.S., Great Britain, Russia, China, France, India and Pakistan?

The countries who signed:
http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/tpnw
1/25/2021 5:41 PM
Anonymous said…
1/25/2021 5:41 PM


Well Honduras signed so that is major step.
1/25/2021 10:32 PM
Anonymous said…
Los Alamos County removed a sign to that effect from it's entrance monument last week. Pursuant to local code, the sign owners have a period of time to claim the sign and pay the county's cost for removing it. I doubt anyone will claim it, although it appeared an expensive sign.
1/26/2021 5:17 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Rumor corner

By scooby
LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.
92 comments
Read more