Skip to main content

Nuclear Weapons are now illegal !!


https://losalamosreporter.com/2021/01/23/ban-treaty-nuclear-weapons-are-new-illegal/

January 22, 2021 will go down in history as the day when the tide turned against nuclear weapons. That’s the day when the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons went into effect, signed by 122 countries. It specifically prohibits nations from developing, testing, using or threatening to use nuclear weapons and assisting others in doing so. It reinforces existing international law obligating all states not to test, use or threaten to use nuclear weapons.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I’m pretty sure the US is not a party to this farce.
Anonymous said…
Pfftt! If it isn't a US law or ratified Treaty, it is not "illegal," except in some liberals' fever dream.
Anonymous said…
Big Whoop. Look at the list and you will note that none of the countries that have nuclear weapons signed this treaty. Israel who has not stated they have them (they do) did not sign. Iran and Iraq did not sign. And what will the countries that did sign do to those that didn't. Will they stop trade with the U.S., Great Britain, Russia, China, France, India and Pakistan?

The countries who signed:
http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/tpnw
Anonymous said…
1/25/2021 5:41 PM


Well Honduras signed so that is major step.
Anonymous said…
Los Alamos County removed a sign to that effect from it's entrance monument last week. Pursuant to local code, the sign owners have a period of time to claim the sign and pay the county's cost for removing it. I doubt anyone will claim it, although it appeared an expensive sign.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...