Skip to main content

Nobel prize winners support Charles Lieber

 Nobel Prize winners come out in favor of lying and tax evasion in the case of Charles Lieber. Note that he’s supported by Harvard professors NOT Harvard which has refused to pay his legal fees.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/nobel-prize-winners-and-other-scientists-come-to-defense-of-harvard-professor-charles-lieber/ar-BB1e7uvR?ocid=uxbndlbing

Comments

Anonymous said…

The realty of this was that Lieber was arrested by Trump for political reasons. Russia is having problems with China and ordered Trump to start creating issues, to hurt both China and the US. We also know that Trump is anti science and would be happy to jail US scientists. Biden should so the right thing and pardon Lieber and other US scientists that caught up in Trumps anti science crusade.
Anonymous said…

Just another witch-hunt.
Anonymous said…
Please enlighten me on how not paying taxes on monies earned overseas is anti-science. I would think that the IRS will go after anyone to get their pound of flesh. Could you provide a transcript of the call from Putin to Trump where the order was given for the anti-science / anti-China purge?
Anonymous said…

How can LLNL and LANL fight late stage capitalism. If make this part of the lab outreach we can attract more young and diverse people,
and fight for a good cause. Charles Leiber was probably a good person before capitalism corrupted him.
Anonymous said…
If make this part of the lab outreach we can attract more young and diverse people,
and fight for a good cause

3/02/2021 4:15 PM

How about just doing good science? You know, what you are paid for?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!