Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Monday, March 15, 2021

PhD versus non-PhD behavior

 Within LLNS, is there a difference between PhD and non-PhD acceptable behavior? If there are differences, how does this impact the acceptance or understanding of "Me Too" concerns at LLNL? What PhD scope of conduct is allowable and accepted with LLNS that is clearly not allowable or accepted among non-PhDs employed by LLNS?

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The fraction of PhDs at the labs is dropping, it is what 15% at this point. Wait a few more years and this question will be irrelevant.

Anonymous said...

A reasonable answer but to the wrong question.

Anonymous said...

3/15/2021 7:18 PM

If the labs lose their PhD's they will be high tech factories with no research. I'm glad I served when they were world-renowned scientific institutions responsible for world-class research.

Anonymous said...

Non-PhD is now a protected class and it is a federal hate crime to discriminate against someone on the basis of educational status. And for good reason, math and science are but mere products of White privilege and oppression owing to their insistence on the "right" answer, whatever that means. What you deride as a lowering of standards is actually great progress in social justice. We will win the next world war based on our strength of diversity and inclusion. The enemy doesn't stand a chance.

Anonymous said...

3/17/2021 6:26 AM is either pure sarcasm, or just silly. Either way, any substantive rebuke is not allowed.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days