Skip to main content

PhD versus non-PhD behavior

Image
By scooby

 Within LLNS, is there a difference between PhD and non-PhD acceptable behavior? If there are differences, how does this impact the acceptance or understanding of "Me Too" concerns at LLNL? What PhD scope of conduct is allowable and accepted with LLNS that is clearly not allowable or accepted among non-PhDs employed by LLNS?

Comments

Anonymous said…
The fraction of PhDs at the labs is dropping, it is what 15% at this point. Wait a few more years and this question will be irrelevant.
3/15/2021 7:18 PM
Anonymous said…
A reasonable answer but to the wrong question.
3/15/2021 9:17 PM
Anonymous said…
3/15/2021 7:18 PM

If the labs lose their PhD's they will be high tech factories with no research. I'm glad I served when they were world-renowned scientific institutions responsible for world-class research.
3/16/2021 5:18 PM
Anonymous said…
Non-PhD is now a protected class and it is a federal hate crime to discriminate against someone on the basis of educational status. And for good reason, math and science are but mere products of White privilege and oppression owing to their insistence on the "right" answer, whatever that means. What you deride as a lowering of standards is actually great progress in social justice. We will win the next world war based on our strength of diversity and inclusion. The enemy doesn't stand a chance.
3/17/2021 6:26 AM
Anonymous said…
3/17/2021 6:26 AM is either pure sarcasm, or just silly. Either way, any substantive rebuke is not allowed.
3/19/2021 5:13 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more