Skip to main content

VSIP?

 So, yet another “Directors All Hands”. Will this be the one where she announces the VSIP?

Comments

Anonymous said…


Why would the offer a VSIP? It makes no sense.

Anonymous said…
Cut the deadwood.....of which there is much!
Anonymous said…
A VSIP only cuts out the deadwood that want to take the money and run. Sometimes you lose good workers as well.

A Layoff cuts out the folks that management thinks is deadwood. And again, sometime you lose good workers as well.

As a recipient of the 2013 buyout, sometimes it works out quite well if the timing is right.
Anonymous said…
After all that couldn’t even watch it. Sowhat did I miss? Any pearls from our leader?
Anonymous said…
Same as the 2006 retirement incentives from UC.
Anonymous said…
Times have changed. No VSIP necessary. Budgets are good this time around!
Anonymous said…

I thought LANL needs to hire 7500 people by 2024 for pit production. So money is just pouring in and there is no way to spend it. They hire anybody and everyone. So no VSIP.
Anonymous said…
The subject post was " So, yet another “Directors All Hands”. Will this be the one where she announces the VSIP?" Notice the pronoun SHE? That would indicated Kim Budil at LLNL, not Tom Mason at LANL.

Of course in this day and age of pronoun usage, how can one be truly sure.

In any event,4/01/2022 12:57 PM's observation that LANL is in the hiring mode might not apply to Livermore.

Is a VSIP actually be offered to Livermore folks, or is it wishful thinking for those looking for the escape hatch lined with gold?
Anonymous said…
LLNL is wasting so much money on the support organisations. These swelled up since the privatization
They created a CIO organization and disguised it as a program.
In the business world, the CIO is crucial to the success of the entire company. At LLNL. a CIO is meaningless. It is the programs that matter.
Anonymous said…
As to the 4/5/2022 2:49 post complaining about the CIO. I assume that CIO is Chief Information Officer. Way back in the stone age all the things computer related ran through the Chemistry and Computations Department headed by Sid Fernbach. As technology progressed and computers became more accessible to all parts of the lab, a lot of different fiefdoms sprung up. You want a cat herder to try to keep from duplicating efforts. With the change of the contract and the NNSA flexing its bureaucratic muscle you need to answer up to all sorts of questions. That seems like a job for a CIO. I am sure the director of the lab would have loved to have a CIO to answer questions when the porn site was found at LLNL in the 1990's. If nothing else, you want a fall guy.

Now back to the original question of the thread: IS THERE A VSIP BEING OFFERED TO LLNL?
Anonymous said…
“ Now back to the original question of the thread: IS THERE A VSIP BEING OFFERED TO LLNL?”



Nope! .....and speaking as “deadwood” I’m so disappointed.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...