Skip to main content

China to produce clean energy with nuclear fusion by 2028?

 So far, Chinese scientists have achieved a reaction running at a slightly cooler 70 million degrees celsius for more than 17 minutes.

https://interestingengineering.com/science/china-aspires-unlimited-clean-energy-2028

Comments

Anonymous said…
So a Livermore blog prints a 30yr old picture of a failed Sandia fusion project with the headline, “China makes fusion by 2028” and we’re supposed to take note? I knew the fusion world was pushing baloney, but this is a new level of nonsense.
Anonymous said…
Hey Scooby, why dont you verify the authencity of your posts. This is old.
Scooby said…
Hello 9/18/2022 2:12 PM
Stop the patronizing!
I keep this blog on a voluntary basis. First, they are readers'posts, not mine. Secondly,I am not the NY Times. I check for obvious fake sources but not for authenticity. Don't bother responding!i.e go away!
Anonymous said…
"I am not the NY Times. I check for obvious fake sources but not for authenticity. Don't bother responding!i.e go away!"


Scooby your standards are probably higher than the NYTs if you check for the obvious fake sources.
Anonymous said…
China is ramping up coal-fired power plants as are many other countries. Cheap power is the road to prosperity, pollution be damned.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.