Skip to main content

China to produce clean energy with nuclear fusion by 2028?

 So far, Chinese scientists have achieved a reaction running at a slightly cooler 70 million degrees celsius for more than 17 minutes.

https://interestingengineering.com/science/china-aspires-unlimited-clean-energy-2028

Comments

Anonymous said…
So a Livermore blog prints a 30yr old picture of a failed Sandia fusion project with the headline, “China makes fusion by 2028” and we’re supposed to take note? I knew the fusion world was pushing baloney, but this is a new level of nonsense.
Anonymous said…
Hey Scooby, why dont you verify the authencity of your posts. This is old.
Scooby said…
Hello 9/18/2022 2:12 PM
Stop the patronizing!
I keep this blog on a voluntary basis. First, they are readers'posts, not mine. Secondly,I am not the NY Times. I check for obvious fake sources but not for authenticity. Don't bother responding!i.e go away!
Anonymous said…
"I am not the NY Times. I check for obvious fake sources but not for authenticity. Don't bother responding!i.e go away!"


Scooby your standards are probably higher than the NYTs if you check for the obvious fake sources.
Anonymous said…
China is ramping up coal-fired power plants as are many other countries. Cheap power is the road to prosperity, pollution be damned.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...