Skip to main content

Scientists Condemn All Threats to Use Nuclear Weapons



https://physicistscoalition.org/1000-scientists-condemn-all-threats-to-use-nuclear-weapons/

"In the statement, which was delivered to key governments and decision makers today, the scientists “… state unequivocally that any threat to use nuclear weapons, at any time and under any circumstances, is extremely dangerous and totally unacceptable. We call on all people and governments everywhere to clearly condemn all nuclear threats, explicit or implicit, and any use of such weapons. With this statement, we add our voices to those already speaking out about the immense danger posed by nuclear weapons and call for immediate and concrete actions towards their elimination.

Well that sure clears thing up, without this letter we would have no idea how dangerous this is. I doubt LANL's pit facility will be seen as the
concrete action they are thinking but who knows they do not seem have any actual proposals for action.

Comments

Anonymous said…


Although this has large list of national academy members and Nobel prize winners, what is more remarkable is that a much and I do mean much large number in these groups did not sign. I am sure all them got this letter and they could only get 10% to sign it. Kind of telling. Whenever you see these "open letters" just ask yourself how many people did not sign it. Humans a good a noticing things are present but they are not good at noting things that are missing.
Anonymous said…
Who is making threats except Putin?
Scooby said…
Hey 1/17/2023 3:52 PM,

Many more would have signed, if they were courageous. Strong belief but ... no .. guts!
Anonymous said…
Many more would have signed, if they were courageous. Strong belief but ... no .. guts!

1/17/2023 7:35 PM


Completely disagree, these are academics and there is no danger whatsoever to signing this. I suspect the rest do not care or do not agree.
Anonymous said…
Or maybe they support Russia and not Ukraine? A growing number of Republicans are opposing further aid to Ukraine. People think not many scientists are Republicans, but that is not true. They are just quiet about it.
Anonymous said…

What does this have to with LLNL or LANL?
Anonymous said…
Or maybe they support Russia and not Ukraine? A growing number of Republicans are opposing further aid to Ukraine. People think not many scientists are Republicans, but that is not true. They are just quiet about it.

1/19/2023 5:06 PM

I doubt there is a single Ph.D scientists who supports Russia. Anyone with any kind of intelligence knows what a threat Putin is to the United States and the world. This new cold war started when Russia literally put Trump into office, Trump tried to take secrets out of the white house to know doubt sell to Russia. If you want to make sure Trump does not come back 2024 then you have to agree that Russia must be defeated at any cost. This is high stakes folks.
Anonymous said…
What you are saying is you doubt there are any Republican Ph.D. scientists. I am here to tell you you are wrong.
Anonymous said…
What you are saying is you doubt there are any Republican Ph.D. scientists. I am here to tell you you are wrong.

1/21/2023 5:15 PM

I have never meet one.
Anonymous said…
1/22/2023 12:00 AM

You should get out of your bubble. I know and have known many. I'm not a Republican since Trump, but if the party ever regains its senses and conservative principles (Trump is not a conservative and neither are most of his MAGA cultists), I'll happily rejoin the party.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!