Plutonium levels near US atomic site in Los Alamos similar to Chornobyl, study finds
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
LGBT intolerance problem at Sandia? I was just checking glassdoor.com and noticed several comments suggesting intolerance to LGBT at Sandia...
-
So did you SSVSP and why? Give details.
-
Tax dollars gone to waste for the "chili cookoff" http://www.sandia.gov/LabNews/100730.html Rumor has it this project didn't a...
4 comments:
Now there's a reputable scientific source. I would totally believe anything they say.
7:24 By the way the americium at Chernobyl is now more dangerous than Pu, due to the beta decay of Pu241 into Am241, which is an alpha emitter.
At the startup of Chernobyl there was no plutonium, the reactor fuel was uranium. The running of the reactor created some Pu, but the main problem was not Pu, instead the reactor fission products. The amount down in the canyon here in Los Alamos is small because Pu was scarce and expensive. They were not just dumping it.
By the way most smoke detectors have Americium in them.
Post a Comment