Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it. Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
Comments
On a serious note though, ignition at NIF clearly kicked off major investor enthusiasm for all things fusion, and given that we are nearing the end of the current economic froth cycle, I don't fault any scientist, even biologists, from cashing in on deep pocketed investors who think fusion is just another app to scale. Honestly, the only thing they are missing here is AI, right? Oh wait, they claim that too. Hold on, I'm also going to have ChatGPT write me a competing business plan to pitch. This could be big.
It's no different than if anybody on this blog makes an offer to invest $1B if commercial fusion is solved. Well, that's not taking a risk because the payoff is much higher than that with probability = 1.0.