Skip to main content

US losing ground

Image
By scooby

 https://www.nature.com/nature-index/research-leaders/2025/nature-index-2025-research-leaders-united-states-losing-ground-as-chinas-lead-expands-rapidly.html


Although the latest data predate the current Trump administration, observers warn that funding cuts will accelerate the rate of China’s gain.


You can say what you want about Trumps cuts which are bad to science but even before Trump we have seen declining science at the labs.

Comments

Anonymous said…
It depends entirely on the metric used to measure success. Sure, using peer reviewed scientific paper output, China may be leaving us in the dust. But at LANL, scientific output hardly matters anymore. The real metric is number of meaningless bean counter, paper pusher, supervisor, manager and regulatory compliance jobs created. And by this metric, we are completely destroying the Chinese. They hold their head in shame at the level of inefficiency that would make even the Soviet Union blush.
9/14/2025 7:28 PM
Anonymous said…
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9wd5qpekkvo

Nasa bans Chinese nationals from working on its space programmes
9/14/2025 7:58 PM
Anonymous said…
7:28. Your jaded view is twenty years too late.
9/14/2025 8:48 PM
Anonymous said…
China was already ahead of the USA in Science, Engineering and R&D. The studies are out there (look for an Aussie group that measures such things). Trump is just nailing the coffin shut. Our science needed fixing and reform. Trump is delivering an execution.
9/15/2025 5:48 AM
Anonymous said…
This is why it is important for the US to have allies -- the scientific output of NATO combined with (for example) Japan, South Korea, and Australia is still no doubt much more than China.
9/15/2025 6:14 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

By scooby
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
96 comments
Read more