Skip to main content

US losing ground

 https://www.nature.com/nature-index/research-leaders/2025/nature-index-2025-research-leaders-united-states-losing-ground-as-chinas-lead-expands-rapidly.html


Although the latest data predate the current Trump administration, observers warn that funding cuts will accelerate the rate of China’s gain.


You can say what you want about Trumps cuts which are bad to science but even before Trump we have seen declining science at the labs.

Comments

Anonymous said…
It depends entirely on the metric used to measure success. Sure, using peer reviewed scientific paper output, China may be leaving us in the dust. But at LANL, scientific output hardly matters anymore. The real metric is number of meaningless bean counter, paper pusher, supervisor, manager and regulatory compliance jobs created. And by this metric, we are completely destroying the Chinese. They hold their head in shame at the level of inefficiency that would make even the Soviet Union blush.
Anonymous said…
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9wd5qpekkvo

Nasa bans Chinese nationals from working on its space programmes
Anonymous said…
7:28. Your jaded view is twenty years too late.
Anonymous said…
China was already ahead of the USA in Science, Engineering and R&D. The studies are out there (look for an Aussie group that measures such things). Trump is just nailing the coffin shut. Our science needed fixing and reform. Trump is delivering an execution.
Anonymous said…
This is why it is important for the US to have allies -- the scientific output of NATO combined with (for example) Japan, South Korea, and Australia is still no doubt much more than China.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!