BLOG purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

UT System critic

http://www.theeagle.com/news/texas/kevin-eltife-joined-the-ut-system-as-an-outspoken-critic/article_0f02a2c5-e7de-5e98-bc3c-7131bb709459.html

Kevin Eltife joined the UT System as an outspoken critic. Now he might reshape it

When former state senator Kevin Eltife was appointed last year to the University of Texas System Board of Regents, he arrived with an attitude shared by many of his old colleagues: skepticism.

Lawmakers had said they were fed up with spending in UT System offices, concentrating their ire on a $215 million land purchase in Houston and a ballooning administrative headcount. Like them, Eltife came in casting a critical eye on system growth and on the ambitious but expensive proposals championed by its leadership.



When the system decided to vie for a contract to manage the Los Alamos National Laboratory – an opportunity supporters said was lucrative and prestigious, but was said to cost over $4 million to bid for – Eltife echoed Longoria, another regent, when she said the project was “outside our mission." Even bidding, opponents suggested, would divert resources away from students – especially against the backdrop of declining state funding for higher education and mounting concern about rising tuition costs.

Eltife told the Tribune this month, weeks after the bid was submitted, that his “ultimate concern with pursuing” the contract was that “it was a system-down initiative.” 

“Our flagship, UT-Austin, wasn’t really excited about pursuing it,” he said. “Do we want initiatives that are started at the system level and pushed down to institutions, or do we want our institutions to bring us the initiatives they want us to help them with?” 

It’s an “area to look at” in the task force’s review, he said. “It’s really a philosophy of what direction you want to go.”

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The final poster on the thread "LANL Legacy cleanup to start soon", February 11, 2018 at 7:19 PM, is absolutely correct. I too lived through and observed all the occurrances the poster did, and my memory of those days exactly parallels the poster's. Apparently Scooby decided it was off topic, because it violated no other rule. That discussion needs to be continued, because so many people posting here do not know or accept the truth. Please go to that post, read it for the truth it is, and post comments here. I bet Scooby doesn't like this idea either.

SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE

Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...