From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use. touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
Comments
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-we-living-in-a-computer-simulation/
https://home.cern/science/computing/birth-web
By the way I am a physicist, so I'm qualified to mix metaphysics with physics as is the fashion these days!
Ok a serous post.
What on earth does NIF, ITER or another fusion breakthrough have to do with quantum computing?
These are completely different topics that no scientific overlap at all. A big breakthrough in fusion will no consequence on if quantum computers can work or not. If they do they can work on the standard energy we use today not fusion generated energy.
The story was just silly on science level. Maybe on some weird hype level non-scientists this
sounds like it all be connected. By the way quantum computing is also a hype filled field, it could be big if it works but so far we have not solved a single problem with these early versions
of quantum computers that are not solvable with classical computers. This could change in coming years and progress is being made, but the amount of hype is rather high.
If NIF works and can give free unlimited energy to everyone it is pretty irrelevant to quantum computing. The only thing that NIF and quantum computing have in common is degree ofhype. It is more justified in quantum computing. NIF is not about nor has ever been about creating a new energy source. Like it or not fusion energy sources are a long way off if ever. Large scale quantum computing devices with real computational advantages is much more likely in the not too distance future.
Or
It's a silly article written by AI.