Going backwards!
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
THIS BLOG WILL NOT POST ANY MAGA PROPAGANDA OR ANY MISINFORMATION REGARDLESS OF SOURCE.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
Dear Blog, I've been working at the Lab for just under a year, and noticed a co-worker showing up for less than 6 hours a day, and no on...
-
Dear Members of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Community: I wanted to take this opportunity to update you on the status of our...
-
There has been some rumors for the past few months of a voluntary separation or layoffs at LANL. On the face of it they do not seem very l...
6 comments:
We don't need science. All we need is more nukes.
NASA hasn’t done much in 50 years. They should be completely shut down.
I’d love to see this person who said nasa hasn’t done much in 50 years. Just to see the face of someone who thinks like this.
I’d love to see this person who said nasa hasn’t done much in 50 years. Just to see the face of someone who thinks like this.
3/08/2025 7:54 PM
LANL is filled with them. They just look like younger engineering/coder types. They don't get the "science thing"
Trump, who is in charge of the second-largest nuclear stockpile in the world, made the shock statement in an interview with Fox News' Sunday Morning Features, telling the broadcaster: 'The level of destruction is beyond anything you can imagine.'
He said: 'We spend a lot of money of nuclear weapons - the level of destruction is beyond anything you can imagine.
'It's just bad that you have to spend all this money on something that if it's used, it's probably the end of the world.'
You could destroy the world 50 times over, 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons, and they're building nuclear weapons.'
He added: 'We're all spending a lot of money that we could be spending on other things that are actually, hopefully, much more productive.'
He isn’t wrong. It’s been a monumental waste of human effort. Of course the issue is getting everyone to honestly agree to arms reduction.
Russia, China and the US, each having a 100 nukes, is more than enough.
There need to be so few that if an accidental (or otherwise) war happens, it doesn’t annihilate the planet.
Post a Comment