Skip to main content

Have you heard from the attorneys?

anonymously suggested topic:

would the person who contacted the law firm report back any news?

Comments

Anonymous said…
...no...there is nothing here/there.
Anonymous said…
You have no case therefore no class action suit. Move on to the next level of your life, please.
Anonymous said…
To think the Lab can be sued for having a layoff is nonsense. However, you need to pay close attention to the details of how it is being implemented. Your best hope is that the Lab is bending its own polices on who is selected.
Anonymous said…
Posters 5:34 & 8:46 my request letter to attorneys did not go unanswered. The post was removed from the blog so I figured nobody cared. Poster 5:34 reminds me of an individual that works in staff relations. 8:46 is closer to the advice that I received from two law firms. One class action law firm bluntly said prove age discrimination and they will move forward. We will see what develops. Things I did find out 300 series exempt individuals that do not supervise more then 50 percent of work time by California law are not exempt employees; they truly should be classified as non-exempt individuals. Do some searches on google regarding this California employment issue you may be surprised what you find. LLNS will be reorganizing job classifications soon. Poster 5:34 I do not see in the separations portion of the Polices and Procedures Manuel that you can exclude an entire program of like in kind individuals (NIF) a 500 series is a 500 series with similar job responsibilities wherever they may reside at the LAB. PPM says that you can exclude on SKA at some management level. So are we saying that all the 500 series technicians on NIF have better SKA’s ? Then any other 500 series at the LAB? Stay tuned. At the end of May (5:34) you may be right, but it never hurts to get outside help now and then instead of listening to the kool-aid being dispensed by management.
Anonymous said…
For those of you (except 200s) who think that seniority is the key factor in determining layoffs within a four digit classification, you should read the details of the Lab's Layoff Policy.

III.2.3 Order of Layoff

The order of layoff for career employees in the same classification (defined as the four digits of the title code) within a unit is in inverse order of Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC seniority except that the department head may retain employees irrespective of seniority who possess special skills, knowledge, or abilities that are not possessed by other employees in the same classification with greater seniority, and that are necessary to perform the ongoing function of the department. All such exceptions are documented and reviewed by the Human Resources Manager.

This appears to be a general approval to use SKAs as the determining factor, not seniority. With this type of exception, management's ability to keep whomever they desire is limited only by their writing ability and imagination.
Anonymous said…
May 7, 2008 6:41 AM

I think it makes sense to have that sort of flexibility. Most everyone on this blog claim they work at the Lab out of a sense of patriotism. I would argue the patriotic thing to do is step out of the way of the guy who has special skills and put aside your selfish, unpatriotic desire to keep your job. Just keep telling yourself "It's for the good of the country".

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!