Contributed anonymously:
1. Aid and comfort to the enemy. The capabilities of the US to defend itself from future threats are certainly less now. Not doubt Russia, China, and Middle-East powers are greatly pleased by the destruction of LLNL.
2. There was intent to commit harm on the US by crippling the ability of LLNL to be a competent steward of the nuclear stockpile. GM and ULM cannot claim ignorance of what might happen. This is supported by the timeline of events and number of managers who collaborated in the efforts. Clearly the actions taken were carefully planned and widely discussed prior to execution. Therefore malice and forethought.
3 comments:
Please take a deep breath. Comparing what we are going through to acts of high treason is mind boggling.
What next, ULM was on the grassy knoll in Dallas back in November '63?
Seems a simple enough question.
If the reason stated is good enough - say yes. If not, say why.
Tempted to say yes. After all, we have a lot of comments here about how the mission has been damaged.
"Intent to commit harm" is in the eye of the beholder. The Federal establishment sent this train in motion. There were different drivers in play than our happiness, but spraying around the term 'treason' is not supported by the two assertions posted. Are we going to take years to work through this? Yes. Is our ability to be a "competent steward of the nuclear stockpile" crippled? Hardly. Who knows, perhaps adversaries are displeased because 100's of mega-bucks will be available to invest in other arenas. Course that's chump change compared to what we've dropped in other hemispheres.
Post a Comment