Skip to main content

Layoffs affecting quality of science

Contributed by Frank Young:


Sunday article by Betsy Mason

Comments

Anonymous said…
This article is right on. Quality science at LLNL is dead because it will be impossible to recruite or retain top talent. Even the rest of us are looking for opportunities with at least a positive work ethic and better working conditions. It is depressing to watch the steady decline in the infrastructure needed to accomplish your daily tasks. Brining in WFO has been a major challenge the last few years due to rising costs, but now with lessening adminstrative and programmatic support it's harder than ever. Doesn't everyone--best & brightest or even just the plain vanilla dedicated employee--want to do good work without having to struggle against increasingly difficult circumstances? Management's plan to reduce cost is to shift cost from one pocket to another. If our "corporate" contract management were to run their corporations the way they are running the lab they would be bankrupt. Where are the improvements that corporate management was supposed to bring to our inefficiently run government organization???
Anonymous said…
Nice summary of the general mood.
Anonymous said…
I surely agree that issues could have been better handled through the contract transition and budget problems. But, I honestly have to believe that an article like this is heavily skewed toward one point of view. I have a few friends who were let go in the ISP. I can surely empathize with them, because I was not sure of my own status. However, I still get a charge out of the work I do. It's still stimulating, interesting and important. I'm a scientist working at a National Lab. That is cool.
Anonymous said…
Read this article, according to the lab spokesperson they think they deserve sainthood for
simply falling into the corporate norm of offering counseling and job fairs. Can you say AT&T or IBM?
Nothing can cover up the fact that this layoff was manipulated, Legal perhaps ,but still manipulated.How else do you justify keeping unvested employees and dumping vested ones? not to mention the ones the protected list. Just because it is legal doesn't make it right. Legality has nothing to do with it just go down to the Southern states and you will find out.
Anonymous said…
To 4:47, that's great you still get a charge out of the work you do, a lot of us also still love what we do. But what the article stated is that we don't trust that we'll be doing it for much longer, regardless of what we are being told. That sums up the mood perfectly.

To 7:03, I agree 100% the layoff was manipulated, but some (not all) layoffs were justified and I think most in that category saw it coming. The lab knew who had to go and did what they had to do to make it happen. Welcome to the private sector.
Anonymous said…
Well the point of the article is not whether we still like the science we're doing, but that we'd all rather do it some place else!
Anonymous said…
https://pao-int.llnl.gov/news/2008/june/docs/061608_miller_column.php

GM goes on to add that "After reading the article in Times on the importance of science I read the article in the local Times about how the quality of science at the lab was suffering because we've fired so many scientists and that all the other good scientists were leaving and we're now unable to hire anyone in. I am bouyed by this news! I can see that by going over to an all management facility, LLNS has helped increase the quality of science happening elsewhere in the bay area. The country as a whole will benefit from the ingenuity and experience of the men and women that used to work for LLNS."
Anonymous said…
To 3:30 p.m.: Perhaps you can post the actual article. The URL you list is a PAO Internal site that those of us who got canned can't access. You've gotta love GM's comment... just goes to show you that the Lab is now willing to operate with mediocre staff (but, hey, the country is really going to benefit from its laid off 'best & brightest'!).
Anonymous said…
The numbers are finally in. In the last month, 10% of my division was let go. Of that 10%, ~85% were scientists, ~15% support/admin, 0% managers.

40% of the division has gone in the last year. We still have the same number of managers though and actually almost the same number of admins.

I think the message is pretty clear.
Anonymous said…
Why would anyone graduating from college or anyone else looking for employment want to work at LLNL ? The word is out - the once great LLNL no longer values its workforce and on May 22 and May 23 kicked out 440 career employees - the vast majority of those were dedicated, valuable and hard working people that had many, many years of excellent service.

Many employees had more than 25 years of outstanding service and probably around 90% had " Q " clearances and yet we were treated like criminals and or " problem employee's " on our lay-off day.

I will never forgive management for forcing me to leave the job I enjoyed for so many years and for the way we were treated on our lay off day.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!