Skip to main content

Lawmakers demand security probe!


article

Comments

Anonymous said…
Dingbell and Stuphack are at it again. Lookup their past history -- they share a big part of the blame for placing the LANL and LLNL contract out to bid.
Anonymous said…
NNSA, which Congress established in 2000 to improve security, has been a disaster from the beginning. It is not semi-autonomous. It follows the same DOE Orders as the rest of DOE, and it is inspected by DOE-HS.

NNSA is nothing more than the same retards we had in DOE, with new office symbols and letterhead, and an additional layer of unneeded management.

There are ~100 NNSA bureaucrats in LSO with nothing to do but make us cost more.
Anonymous said…
"There are ~100 NNSA bureaucrats in LSO with nothing to do but make us cost more." - June 26, 2008 8:59 PM

..and take lucrative jobs with the for-profit LLCs they once managed for NNSA. Follow the money over the next few years. Some of these NNSA bureaucrats are going to make out very well, indeed!
Anonymous said…
July 7, 2008 12:16 AM

I have no doubt that some high-level Wash DC bureaucrats will find lucrative jobs at the Labs they supposedly now manage. However, the LSO tribe is probably not in this group. With the exception of a few lower-level folks, these people are truly worthless. Most would not even qualify to flip burgers, let alone be SESs or GM-15s.
Anonymous said…
July 7, 2008 12:16 AM


Amen. Let's hear it for diversity.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...