Skip to main content

LAPIS disabled temporarily.

Image
By scooby
Anonymously asked:

In today's News Online, "LAPIS view paycheck temporarily disabled" Does this mean that additional people will be recieving their final paycheck on short notice?

Comments

Anonymous said…
yes ULM plans to wack 100 flex term June 26. plus additional 100 ftes they missed in may
6/17/2008 8:23 PM
Anonymous said…
What do you mean by "another 100 ftes they missed in may"? I thought the 440 released plus the ~100 flex were supposed to be the "end" of the ISP.
6/17/2008 8:54 PM
Neko said…
I'm willing to bet that LLNS is not done with "ftes", but I don't think it's going to happen this month - just some people like to stir things up.
6/18/2008 4:21 PM
Anonymous said…
Oops! I commented before reading this blog. Sorry Mr. Blogger for posting in wrong place...peace :)
6/18/2008 8:17 PM
Anonymous said…
The 440 left open a way to let 95 more go end of June.
(440+95+535 FTE's)

I smell a rat
6/18/2008 8:20 PM
Anonymous said…
There are no 100 additional FTEs. The 100 Flex Term number is dropping daily. Expect only ~1/3 that many to get whacked on 6/26.

Remember, however, that Flex Terms can be whacked at anytime, as long as the running quota does not exceed the trip point for a WARN Act letter.
6/19/2008 9:22 PM
Neko said…
LLNS can actually whack every FLEX when their term expires with no warning what so ever.
6/20/2008 8:58 AM
Anonymous said…
The primary reason that the number of Flex Terms to be whacked next week is less than GM's magic 100 is that many employees (al types) are bailing out on their own.

Remmeber, fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
6/20/2008 10:11 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more