Skip to main content

Seek workers' ideas on how to avoid layoffs


May be LLNS can learn from this

Comments

Anonymous said…
Maybe LLNS can learn from UC:

New UC president is pan cake aficionado with $900K compensation package (more than double his predecessors package). UC layoffs pending, reduction in available courses, huge increases in student costs and fees underway.

Obviously this is where Mike and George learned their management styles.

http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_9396099?IADID=Search-www.insidebayarea.com-www.insidebayarea.com

New UC President will be living very well
http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_9341391?IADID=Search-www.insidebayarea.com-www.insidebayarea.com

UC students face fee hikes and class cuts http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_9174582?IADID=Search-www.insidebayarea.com-www.insidebayarea.com

UC seeks to rein in retirement http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_9327090?IADID=Search-www.insidebayarea.com-www.insidebayarea.com

Facing budget cuts, COS salary raised 26% (a $61K increase) http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/01/18/BAI0UH3QH.DTL
Anonymous said…
I already tried showing them ways to avoid the layoffs. They were not interested. They were also not interested in one employee exchanging with another, or in employees choosing to be layed off first.

In short, they specifically targeted people for this layoff, people they didnt want around. People that would make them look bad, people with medical conditions, people close to retirement but not quite,etc.
Anonymous said…
Again I will say this. LLNS doesn't give a hoot about what you think. They have an agenda and it will be done. Cut, cut, cut, downsize, downsize, downsize but none of the cuts will come from ULM where the savings really is.
Anonymous said…
If you are < 50 and Flex or SL and don't like it here, do your part and leave. That will save someone else's job who is close to retirement.
Stop procrastinating!
Anonymous said…
LLNS is quickly learning from LANS how to avoid layoffs - the term is "managed attrition". Almost a year ago at LANL, this term was attributed to a statement made in a meeting by Anastasio. The gist of it is - make employees' working conditions so miserable that employees will leave on their own. There is a lot of evidence that people are steadily leaving LANL for greener pastures (which seems an incredibly simple task if you think about it). From what I've heard, many good people are also leaving LLNL.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.