Thursday, June 26, 2008

Lawmakers demand security probe!


article

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dingbell and Stuphack are at it again. Lookup their past history -- they share a big part of the blame for placing the LANL and LLNL contract out to bid.

Anonymous said...

NNSA, which Congress established in 2000 to improve security, has been a disaster from the beginning. It is not semi-autonomous. It follows the same DOE Orders as the rest of DOE, and it is inspected by DOE-HS.

NNSA is nothing more than the same retards we had in DOE, with new office symbols and letterhead, and an additional layer of unneeded management.

There are ~100 NNSA bureaucrats in LSO with nothing to do but make us cost more.

Anonymous said...

"There are ~100 NNSA bureaucrats in LSO with nothing to do but make us cost more." - June 26, 2008 8:59 PM

..and take lucrative jobs with the for-profit LLCs they once managed for NNSA. Follow the money over the next few years. Some of these NNSA bureaucrats are going to make out very well, indeed!

Anonymous said...

July 7, 2008 12:16 AM

I have no doubt that some high-level Wash DC bureaucrats will find lucrative jobs at the Labs they supposedly now manage. However, the LSO tribe is probably not in this group. With the exception of a few lower-level folks, these people are truly worthless. Most would not even qualify to flip burgers, let alone be SESs or GM-15s.

Anonymous said...

July 7, 2008 12:16 AM


Amen. Let's hear it for diversity.

LLNS Contract discussion

SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE

Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...