Skip to main content

LANS lawyered up over fence failure

LANS lawyered up over fence failure

There are some reports that claim a legal battle is brewing over the TA 55 security fence construction project. Always thought that LANS had some good in house lawyers so this must be a really strange deal if they have to bring in outside legal big guns. On the outside it doesn't look like much of a case, since the problems apparently had been widely known for over a year. It could also just be a ploy to divert attention away long enough for the board to find some new leaders.

Comments

Anonymous said…
That was the Rodey Law Firm that took on the LANL litigants back in the day. Is the Lab using these crooks again to take on this case?
Anonymous said…
The first question that must be answered: Is LANS up to managing LANL? Once we can answer this very vital question, then we can proceed to fix all of the problems facing LANL.
Anonymous said…
Once LANL starts hiring the "Big Guns" to defend their behind, you can rest assured it's gonna big big. Start counting the $$$ lower moral, bad press, and more attention to a broken Lab.
Anonymous said…
Once Captain D'Agostino goes -- which should be fairly soon now given his long list of documented failures... anyone remember his glorious "Complex 2030" hype? -- then you can expect that both LANS and LLNS will follow out the front door with their Bechtel buddies.

It was D'Agostino who single handedly decided on LANS/Bechtel as the LANL contractor. It was one of D'Agostino's hand-picked loyalist who then single handedly selected LLNS/Bechtel for the subsequent LLNL contractor.

On the downside, you can also expected some rather nasty "right-sizing" of the complex to take place soon after D'Agostino, LANS and LLNS are finally given the boot by Congress. Duck & cover!




Anonymous said…
On the downside, you can also expected some rather nasty "right-sizing" of the complex to take place soon after D'Agostino, LANS and LLNS are finally given the boot by Congress. Duck & cover!

November 28, 2012 12:05 AM

Where's the downside to any of this? Frankly, the taxpayers are sick and tired of all the golden toilet seats, particularly at LANL.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...